Seeking Eccentricity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2021.I-VIKeywords:
Eccentricity, Feminist Epistemologies, Researching OtherwiseAbstract
This Sociology and Technoscience monograph extends conversations and uses of eccentricity as a methodological tool for doing research within the field of feminist and gender studies. The search for eccentricity responds to the editors’ interest in reflecting on and engaging with different methodological approaches which help deviate from canonical established patterns of research onto unusual and provocative ways of doing research differently. In this collection we have gathered contributions dealing with the analysis of technologies of gender, sexuality and bodies to propose new ways to defocus, dislocate or blur the split between subjects and objects of study. In sum, with this monograph we intend to contribute to gender approaches to science by exploring "eccentrically" the ways feminist and gender scholars think and research otherwise.
Feminist modes of knowledge and doing research have traditionally been excluded from academic discourses or denied the merits of their own specificity due to the constitution of the notion of “women” as a sexual differentiated subject. “Women”, as epistemological subject, has been trapped between the unrepresented or unrepresentable due to the articulation of what Michel Foucault calls “technologies of sex” - that is, mechanisms, apparatuses and discourses (legal, pedagogical, medical, demographic, religious or economic) that regulate sexuality. Following the Foucaultian concept, Teresa De Lauretis (1987) coins the concept of “technologies of gender” to move away from the idea of gender as sexual difference towards its comprehension as a political tool instead. Technologies are hence understood as inseparable from their sociocultural milieus and the semiotic apparatuses which produce women and men, assigning an identity and a position to each individual within the social group.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Sara. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.
Anzaldúa, Gloria. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Books.
Benhabib, Seyla. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (Cambridge: Polity, 1992).
Barad, Karen. (2003). “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831.
Barad, Karen. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Brah, Avtar. (1996). Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London and New York: Routledge.
Braidotti, Rosi. (1994). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Literary Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Braidotti, Rosi and Griffin, Gabrielle. (2002). Thinking Differently. A Reader in European Women's Studies. London: Zed Books.
Buikema, Rosemarie, Griffin, Gabrielle and Lykke, Nina (2011). Theories and Methodologies of Postgraduate Feminist Research: Researching Differently New York and London: Routledge.
Butler, Judith. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
De Lauretis, Teresa. (1987). Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
De Lauretis, Teresa. (1990). “Eccentric Subjects: Feminist Theory and Historical Consciousness”. Feminist Studies, 16(1), 115-150.
De Lauretis, Teresa. (2005). "When Lesbians were not Women," in Namascar Shaktini. ed. On Monique Wittig: Theoretica, Political and Literary Essays. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Foucault, Michel. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Vol.1. Translated from the French by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.
Halberstam, Jack. (2011). The Queer Art of Failure. New York: Duke University Press.
Haraway, Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (1985; New York: Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181
Hull, Gloria T., Bell-Scott, Patricia and Smith, Barbara. (1982). All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave. New York: The Feminist Press, 1982.
Kristeva, Julia. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Roudiez, L. S. (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Moraga, Cherrie and Anzaldúa, Gloria. (Eds.) (1981). This Bridge Called my Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Watertown, Mass.: Persephone Press.
Mohanty, Chandra. (1988). “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses” Feminist Review, 30, 61-88.
Negrón-Muntaner, F. (2020). “Decolonial Joy: Theorising from the Art of Valor y Cambio” in Suzanne Clisby et al. (eds.) Theorising Cultures of Equality. (London and N.Y.: Routledge), pp. 171-194.
Spivak G Gayatri. (1983). “Can the Subaltern Speak?” reprinted in Williams, Patrick and Christman, Laura (eds), Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory. A reader. London: Pearson.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Sociología y tecnociencia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Sociología y Tecnociencia.
