Use of Technological Devices and (Re)victimization in Gender-based Crimes in Spain: A Qualitative Study on Professionals’ Perceptions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2022.56-72

Keywords:

Gender-based Crimes; Revictimization; Technology; COMET; Electronic Devices.

Abstract

In Spain, compliance with protection orders in gender-based violence crimes are sometimes monitored with electronic devices. The objective of this paper is to analyze the use of electronic devices from the perspective of professionals involved in the assistance of victims.  Method: We have carried out in-depth interviews with professionals in the gender-based violence sector in the region of Madrid. In particular, 59 workers (n=59), such as lawyers, social workers, psychologist, police officers, etc., have been interviewed. Results:  From the perspective of the professionals electronic devices do not contribute to the well-being of the victims, but revictimizes survivors who wear the device. Moreover, these devices might be counterproductive because they could reduce the fear of crime but does not decrease real vulnerability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Clara Sainz de Baranda Andujar, Carlos III University of Madrid

     

     

References

Bell, M. E. & Goodman, L. A. (2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system. Violence Against Women, 7(12), 1377–1404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122183919

Bivens, R., & Hasinoff, A. A. (2017). Rape: is there an app for that? An empirical analysis of the features of anti-rape apps. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1050–1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1309444

Blanco-Ruiz, M. (2014). Implicaciones del uso de las redes sociales en el aumento de la violencia de género en adolescentes. Revista Comunicación y Medios, 30, 124-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/rcm.v0i30.32375

Blöbaum , A., Hunecke, M. (2005). Perceived danger in urban public space: The impacts of physical features and personal factors. Environment and Behavior, 37, 465-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269643

Castillejo Manzanares, R. (2016). El estatuto de la víctima y las víctimas de violencia de género. Diario La Ley, (8884).

Comunidad de Madrid (2020). Red de atención integral para la violencia de género. Retrieved from: https://www.comunidad.madrid/servicios/asuntos-sociales/red-atencion-ntegralviolencia-genero#

Cordier, R., Chung, D., Wilkes-Gillan, S., & Speyer, R. (2019). The Effectiveness of Protection Orders in Reducing Recidivism in Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 152483801988236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019882361

Dimond, J. P., Fiesler, C., & Bruckman, A. S. (2011). Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 413–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.006

Dimond, J., Casey, F. & Bruckman, A. (2011). Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers, 23(5):413-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.006

Dragiewicz, M., Harris, B., Woodlock, D., Salter, M., Easton, H., Lynch, A., Campbell, H., Leach, J., Milne, L. (2019). Domestic violence and communication technology: Survivor experiences of intrusion, surveillance, and identity crime. The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN).

Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. SAGE.

García-Jiménez, M., Cala-Carrillo, M. J., & Trigo, M. E. (2019). Predicting Disengagement from Judicial Proceedings by Female Victims of Intimate Partner Violence in Spain: A Systematic Replication with Prospective Data. Violence Against Women. 26(12-13), 1493–1516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219882502

Gómez Plaza, A., Villajos Pozuelo, S., Candeira de Andrés, L. & Hernández Gómez, A. (2019). Estudio sobre el tiempo que tardan las mujeres víctimas de violencia de género en verbalizar su situación. Madrid: Ministerio de la Presidencia, Relaciones con las Cortes e Igualdad Centro de Publicaciones.

Harris, B., Woodlock, D. (2018). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy052

Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2015). Beyond the “sext”: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48, 104-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865814524218

Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2015). Embodied Harms. Violence Against Women, 21(6), 758–779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576581

Henry, N., Flynn, A., & Powell, A. (2020). Technology-Facilitated Domestic and Sexual Violence: A Review. Violence Against Women, 26(15-16), 1828–1854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875821

Hicks, M. (2017). Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its Edge in Computing. MIT Press.

Hill, C., & Johnson, H. (2019). Online Interpersonal Victimization as a Mechanism of Social Control of Women: An Empirical Examination. Violence Against Women, 26 (12-13): 107780121987060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219870608

Hockey, D. (2016). Burglary crime scene rationality of a select group of non-apprehend burglars. SAGE Open. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016640589

Hockey, D. (2016). Burglary crime scene rationality of a select group of non-apprehend burglars. SAGE Open, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016640589

Hollander, J. (2018). Women’s self-defense and sexual assault resistance: The state of the field. Sociology Compass, 12: e12597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12597

Kanuha, V. K., & Ross, M. L. (2004). The use of temporary protection orders (TROs) as a strategy to address intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, Jun; 19(3): 343-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.3.343.65766

Kenny, E. J., & Donnelly, R. (2019). Navigating the gender structure in information technology: How does this affect the experiences and behaviours of women?: Human Relations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719828449

Kuhns, J. B., Blevins, K. R., & Lee, S. (2012). Understanding decisions to burglarize from the offender’s perspective. Technical report for the Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: The need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. GE '18: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering. May 2018: 14–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3195570.3195580

Lee, D. R., Hilinski-Rosick, C. M. (2012). The role of lifestyle and personal characteristics of fear of victimization among university students. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 647-668. DOI: https://doi.org/2010.1007/s12103-011-9136-0

Leganés Gómez, S. (2015). La víctima del delito en la ejecución penitenciaria. Diario La Ley, (8619).

Logan, T. & Walker, R. (2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 4, 675-692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317186

Logan, T. K. & Walker, R. W. (2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper? Violence and Victims, 25(3), 332–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.332

Logan, T., Shannon, L., Cole, J., & Walker, R. (2006). The Impact of Differential Patterns of Physical Violence and Stalking on Mental Health and Help-Seeking Among Women With Protective Orders. Violence Against Women, 12(9), 866–886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206292679

Lopez-Neira, I., Patel, T., Parkin, S., Danezis, G., & Tanczer, L. (2019). “Internet of things”: How abuse is getting smarter. Safe—The Domestic Abuse Quarterly, 63, 22–26. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.3350615

Lousada Arochena, J. F. (2017). Aproximación al estatuto de la víctima del delito desde la perspectiva de género. Aequalitas: Revista Jurídica De Igualdad De Oportunidades Entre Mujeres Y Hombres, (40), 12-26. Retrieved from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6235650.pdf

Magro Servet, V. (2015). Novedades de la ley 4/2015, de 27 de abril, del estatuto de la víctima del delito y especial incidencia en la violencia de género. Diario La Ley, (8638).

Maxwell, L., Sanders, A., Skues, J., & Wise, L. (2020). A Content Analysis of Personal Safety Apps: Are They Keeping Us Safe or Making Us More Vulnerable? Violence Against Women, 26(2), 233–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219832124

Fiolet, R., Brown, C., Wellington, M., Bentley, K. & Hegarty, K. (2021). Exploring the Impact of Technology-Facilitated Abuse and Its Relationship with Domestic Violence: A Qualitative Study on Experts’ Perceptions. Global Qualitative Nursing Research Volume, 8: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211028176

Nistal Burón, J. (2017). Los derechos de la víctima del delito en el ámbito de la ejecución penal. El «derecho a saber» y el «derecho a recurrir» en los términos establecidos en el estatuto de la víctima (Ley4/2015). Diario La Ley, (8999).

Piippo, S., Hirvonen, P., & Anand, J. C. (2020). Professional Self-Positioning of Indian Social Workers in Response to Domestic Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922920

Plasencia Domínguez, N. (2016). Participación de la víctima en la ejecución de las penas privativas de libertad. Diario La Ley, (8683).

Plasencia Domínguez, N. (2019). Violencia de género y ejecución penal. Diario La Ley, (9429).

Rodríguez Luna, R. & Bodelón González, E. (2015). Mujeres maltratadas en los juzgados: la etnografía como método para entender el derecho "en acción". Revista de Antropología Social, 24, 105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RASO.2015.v24.50645

Russell, B. (2012). Effectiveness, Victim Safety, Characteristics, and Enforcement of Protective Orders. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 531–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.531

Southworth, C., Finn, J., Dawson, S., Fraser, C., & Tucker, S. (2007). Intimate Partner Violence, Technology, and Stalking. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 842–856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207302045

Sumartojo, S., Pink, S., Lupton, D., & LaBond, C. H. (2016). The affective intensities of datafied space. Emotion, Space and Society, 21, 33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2016.10.004

Tilley, N., Thompson, R., Farrell, G., Grove, L., & Tseloni, A. (2015). Do burglar alarms increase burglary risk? A counter-intuitive finding and possible explanations. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 17(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2014.17

Tilley, N., Thompson, R., Farrell, G., Grove, L., Tseloni, A. (2015). Do burglar alarms increase burglary risk? A counter-intuitive finding and possible explanations. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 17(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2014.17

Wajcman, J. (2004). El Tecnofeminismo. Madrid: Cátedra.

Walter S. DeKeseredy, W.S. (2020). Bringing Feminist Sociological Analyses of Patriarchy Back to the Forefront of the Study of Woman Abuse. Violence Against Women, 27, 5, 621-638. DOI: https://doi.org/

White, D., & McMillan, L. (2019). Innovating the Problem Away? A Critical Study of Anti-Rape Technologies. Violence Against Women, 107780121985611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219856115

Woodlock, D. (2017). The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216646277

Yardley, E. (2020). Technology-Facilitated Domestic Abuse in Political Economy: A New Theoretical Framework. Violence Against Women, 107780122094717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220947172

Additional Files

Published

2022-02-11

How to Cite

Use of Technological Devices and (Re)victimization in Gender-based Crimes in Spain: A Qualitative Study on Professionals’ Perceptions. (2022). Sociología Y Tecnociencia, 12(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2022.56-72