The role of technology as driving force of the social change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/st.2.2022.20-34Keywords:
Emerging technologies, Society and social change, Globalization and innovationAbstract
The progressive and constant deployment of new technologies has remarkably impacted on the society, even inadvertently. It constitutes, without any doubt, a timely agent and force for any social change, as we can evidence analyzing its incidence in diverse aspects such as companies and industries, or the productive sector generally speaking, the communication channels and mass media, the social relationships, and markedly on the citizenship quality of life. To adequately framework the last impact of this technological development, it is convenient to not forget its imbrication within the globalization phenomena, aligned with the milestones of the emerging technologies, and with the parallel growth of the information society. This would allow its analysis not only looking at the tangible results for the society, but also underlining those undesired consequences for the contemporaty societies. We hope to achieve with this approach a correct perspective for the subject of our research.
Downloads
References
Almond, G., y Verba, S. (1970). La cultura cívica. Madrid: Fundación Foessa.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N., y Pasquino, G. (1981). Diccionario de política. México D.F.: Siglo XXI.
Castells, M. (1995). La ciudad informacional. Tecnologías de la información, reestructuración económica y el proceso urbano-regional. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Easton, D. (1981). The political system besieged by the state. Political Theory, 9(3), 303-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009059178100900303
Fukuyama, F. (1996). El fin de la historia y el último hombre. Barcelona: Planeta.
Foucault, M. (1969). L´Archéologie du savoir. Gallimard.
Giddens, A. (1994). Más allá de la izquierda y la derecha: el futuro de las políticas radicales. Cátedra: Madrid.
Habermas, J. (2010). Facticidad y validez. Trotta: Madrid.
Heller, H. (1998). Teoría del Estado. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Hobbes, T. (1651). Philosophical Rudiments concerning Government and Society. London: R. Royston.
Huntintong, S. P. (1997). El choque de civilizaciones y la reconfiguración del orden mundial. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Kymlicka, W. (1999). Ciutadania Multicultural. Una teoria liberal dels drets de les minories. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat Oberta.
Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Cambio social con respecto a la cultura y a Nature Original. Nueva York: Viking Press.
Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work. Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. New york: Tarcher/Putnam.
Tortosa, J.M. (1992). Sociología del sistema mundial. Madrid: Tecnos.
Veblen, T. (1971). La teoría de la clase del ocio. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Wallerstein, I. (1991). World system versus world-systems: A critique. Critique of Anthropology, 11(2), 189-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9101100207
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 26/11/2022 (2)
- 11/09/2022 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Juan-Carlos Sancho-Garcia, Adrián Ivorra-Alemañy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Sociología y tecnociencia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Sociología y Tecnociencia.