Muhammadiyah and Religious Moderation: Response to Actions of Muhammadiyah to Prevent Modern Radicalism (Case Study of Leadership Period 2015 – 2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2023.102-126Keywords:
Radicalism, Islam Movement, Moderate, Social Conflict, MuhammadiyahAbstract
This study will narrate the response of Muhammadiyah's actions in stemming Radicalism in the leadership of Haedar Nashir, namely the period 2015 - 2021, the reaction of Muhammadiyah's Radicalism at this time, offering a Moderation program for the fight against Radicalism. After the Reformation, it experienced radicalization in ideological power. The form of Radicalism was not only in the scope of religious ideology but also entered the scope of the ideologies of liberalism, capitalism, totalitarianism to fascism. Therefore, it can be concluded that Radicalism is not only from the point of view of religious activity but also that ideology can be implemented in a system of Radicalism in the form of Economics and Politics. This research has a problem formulation, namely, how is Muhammadiyah's response in stemming Radicalism? Especially three points of view from Religious Radicalism, Economics, and Politics. This study also uses two theories, namely the theory of Moderation and the idea of Radicalism. The research method used is descriptive qualitative to examine Muhammadiyah and Moderation on the response of Muhammadiyah's leadership in 2015-2021 in stemming Radicalism related to the research questions in the background. This qualitative research uses a previous study's literature study data collection technique. The researcher also tries to take a literature review from the Connected paper application with two keywords, Muhammadiyah Moderation and Muhammadiyah Radicalism. The qualitative data analysis is interpreted by analyzing data reduction, data exposure, and drawing conclusions or verifying conclusions
Downloads
References
Pengetahuan Indonesia website: https://aipi.or.id/frontend/opinion/detail/7a5a3237417977655975795a4535696d4951736b2f5075357a7362687a44743742424c41546235684373306e68415a764a513242663252674869346449665a6a52556274704f39554d75524e656d4f6b4f45424553673d3d
Bedmar, V. L.-. (2020). Islamic religion teacher training in Spain: Implications for preventing islamic-inspired violent radicalism. Journal Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 95.
Budiharto, I. (2022). Konflik Politik Agraria Di Desa Wadas Pasca Rencana Pembangunan Bendungan Bener Kabupaten Purworejo Tahun 2018-2021. Universitas Jendral Soedirman.
Chaudhry, M. S. (2012). Sistem Ekonomi Islam Prinsip Dasar. Kencana Prenadamedia.
CNN Indonesia. (2015). Kriteria Situs Islam Radikal Versi BNPT.
Crook, S. (1990). The End of Radical Social Theory? Radicalism, Modernism and Postmodernism. Postmodernism and Society.
Databoks. (2018). 1% Orang Terkaya Indonesia Menguasai 46% Kekayaan Penduduk. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2018/10/30/1-orang-terkaya-indonesia-menguasai-46-kekayaan-penduduk
Diko. (2020). Menanamkan Spirit Kapitalisme dan Sosialisme Pada Lembaga Zakat. Suara Muhammadiyah. https://suaramuhammadiyah.id/2020/12/04/menanamkan-spirit-kapitalisme-dan-sosialisme-pada-lembaga-zakat/
Dzulfaroh, A. N. (2020). Tiga Catatan Kritis untuk Omnibus Law UU Cipta Kerja. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/10/07/071000265/tiga-catatan-kritis-untuk-omnibus-law-uu-cipta-kerja?page=all
Global Wealth Report. (2018). Research Institute.
Husada, E., Sujiyantoko, Ginna R., S., Tolisalim, O., Najiburrahman, M., Badr, A. M., … Agustin, T. (2007). Kajian Islam Kontemporer. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press.
Ilham. (2022). Moderasi Beragama dalam Perspektif Muhammadiyah. Retrieved from muhammadiyah.or.id website: https://muhammadiyah.or.id/moderasi-beragama-dalam-perspektif-muhammadiyah/
ITB Ahmad Dahlan. (2012). Kemenag Hadiah untuk NU, Haedar Nashir: Narasi Radikal. Itb-Ad.Ac.Id. https://www.itb-ad.ac.id/2021/10/26/kemenag-hadiah-untuk-nu-haedar-nashir-narasi-radikal/
Jamil, M. (2017). Hukum dan Radikalisme Agama Di Indonesia. Hukum Dan Radikalisme Agama Di Indonesia, 17–18.
Ismayilov, M. (2019). Islamic radicalism that never was: Islamic discourse as an extension of the elite’s quest for legitimation. Azerbaijan in focus. Journal Of Eurasian Studies.
Keizer, P. (2015). Radical Ecomonics. Multidisciplinary Economics: A Methodological Account.
Keuangannews.id. (2022). IDe: Pemerintahan Jokowi Otoriter dan Korup! Keuangannews.Id. https://keuangannews.id/ide-pemerintahan-jokowi-otoriter-dan-korup/
Kosasih, A. D. (2010). Pola Kepemimpinan Organisasi Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Islamadina, Volume 9(No 1), 30–46.
Kudriashova, N. (2018). Radicalization and Political Radicalism On Political Psychology. Grin.Com. https://www.grin.com/document/457908
Lembaga Hikmah dan Kebijakan Publik PP Muhammadiyah. (2021). Catatan Kritis 2 Tahun Pemerintahan: Melayani Oligarki atau Rakyat? Kumparan.Com. https://kumparan.com/lhkpppmuh/catatan-kritis-2-tahun-pemerintahan-melayani-oligarki-atau-rakyat-1xBxZMAFRt1
Mukhibat. (2018). Preventing Religious Radicalism Based on Local Wisdom: Interrelation of Tarekat, Adat, and Local Authority in Padang Pariaman, West Sumatera, Indonesia. Sosio Humanika Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, Vol 11(No 1).
Mukhibat. (2014). Re-Edukasi dan Re-Motivasi terhadap Pelaku Radikalisme dan Terorisme: Membangun Kesadaran Keagamaan yang Inklusif dan Humanis di Indonesia. Sosio Humanika Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, Vol. 7(No. 1).
Munir, B. (2020). Bukan Saja Tolak Jabatan, Muhammadiyah Konsisten Kritisi Pemerintah. Nasional.Sindonews.Com. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/281690/12/bukan-saja-tolak-jabatan-muhammadiyah-konsisten-kritisi-pemerintah-1609049561?showpage=all
Muxel, A. (2020). Political Radicalism Among The Younger Generations. Youth And Globalization, 2, 123–136.
Mufaizin. (2020). Gerakan Radikalisme Islam Klasik dan Kontemporer. Jurnal Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Volume 6(No. 1), 115–126.
Mufarida, B. (2021). Muhammadiyah Pertanyakan Urgensi Perpres Ekstremisme. Nasional.Sindonews.Com. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/311830/12/muhammadiyah-pertanyakan-urgensi-perpres-ekstremisme-1611446478
Muhammadiyah. (2022). Kerusakan Alam Terjadi Akibat Paradigma Pembangunan yang Serba Pragmatis dan Instrumental. Muhammadiyah.or.Id. https://muhammadiyah.or.id/kerusakan-alam-terjadi-akibat-paradigma-pembangunan-yang-serba-pragmatis-dan-instrumental/
Nashir, H. (2009). Revitalisasi Visi dan Karakter Bangsa : Agenda Indonesia ke Depan. Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah.
Nelson, J. (2017). What Is Radical Economics? (Hint: It’s Not Neoliberal or Marxist). Evonomics. https://evonomics.com/radical-economics-hint-not-neoliberal-marxist/
Nurish, A. (2019). Muhammadiyah dan Arus Radikalisme. Maarif Arus Pemikiran Islam Dan Sosial, 14(2).
Pratama. (2021). Model Ekonomi Produktif Penguat Gerakan Ekonomi Muhammadiyah. Retrieved from Malangtimes website: https://www.malangtimes.com/baca/74992/20211220/151400/model-ekonomi-produktif-penguat-gerakan-ekonomi-muhammadiyah#:~:text=Gerakan ekonomi Muhammadiyah tidak hanya,signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional.
Raharjo, D. B. (2020). Ketum Muhammadiyah Singgung Masalah Bangsa Mulai Korupsi hingga Oligarki. Suara.Com. https://www.suara.com/news/2020/11/18/172220/ketum-muhammadiyah-singgung-masalah-bangsa-mulai-korupsi-hingga-oligarki
Ramadhaniani, A. (2015). Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia Merusak Lingkungan. Properti.Kompas.Com. https://properti.kompas.com/read/2015/12/23/150000721/Pembangunan.Infrastruktur.di.Indonesia.Merusak.Lingkungan
Ramadhan, M. (2015). Deradikalisasi Agama Melalui Pendidikan Multikultural dan Inklusivisme (Studi Pada Pasantren Al - Hikah Benda Sirampog Brebes). Jurnal Smart Studi Masyarakat, Religi Dan Tradisi, Vol.1(Issue 2).
Sadono, B. (2021). Pro Kontra Terhadap Prosedur dan Substasi Omnibus Law Rancangan Undang - Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, Vol.15(No.3).
Sari, Z. (2013). Kemuhammadiyahan. Perpustakaan Nasional.
Sasongko, A. (2015). Muhammadiyah Rumuskan Cetak Biru Gerakan Ekonomi. Retrieved from Republika website: https://www.republika.co.id/berita/dunia-islam/islam-nusantara/15/05/27/nozrfr-muhammadiyah-rumuskan-cetak-biru-gerakan-ekonomi
Said, H. A., & Rauf, F. (2015). Radikalisme Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-’Adalah, 12(3), 593–610.
Shagan, E. (2011). The Rule of Moderation: Violence, Religion and the Politics of Restraint in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, L. (2021). Aesthetics of authority: ‘Islam Nusantara’ and Islamic ‘radicalism’ in Indonesian film and social media. Journal Religion, Vol.51(No.2).
Setiawan, R. (2020). Muhammadiyah Tetap Tolak UU Ciptaker, PBNU & PGI Belum Bersikap. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/muhammadiyah-tetap-tolak-uu-ciptaker-pbnu-pgi-belum-bersikap-f5CK
Soebadjo, H. (2021). Trias Kredensial: Radikalisme Agama, Intoleransi dan Ekstremisme (1). Wartakota.Tribunnnews. https://wartakota.tribunnews.com/2021/10/09/trias-kredensial-radikalisme-agama-intoleransi-dan-ekstremisme-1
Suara Muhammadiyah. (2020). Ancaman Oligarki Bisnis dan Politik bagi Lingkungan. Retrieved from Suara Muhammadiyah website: https://suaramuhammadiyah.id/2020/01/04/ancaman-oligarki-bisnis-dan-politik-bagi-lingkungan/
Suwarno, M. P. (1995). Gerakan Islam Muhammadiyah. Persatuan Offset.
Trebin, M. P. (2019). РАДИКАЛІЗМ У СУЧАСНОМУ СВІТІ: СОЦІАЛЬНО-ПОЛІТИЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ. Вісник НЮУ Імені Ярослава Мудрого". Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія, Vol 4(No 43).
Wahyudin, D. (2017). Pendidikan Aswaja Sebagai Upaya Menangkal Radikalisme. Jurnal Dinamika Penelitian, Vol.17(No 2).
Wahono. (2019). Prof. Haedar Nashir : Moderasi Jalan Tengah Hadapi Radikalisme di Indonesia. S3pi.Umy.Ac.Id.
Winters, J. (2013). Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Journal Indonesia, 96.
Zuhdi, M. A. (2010). Fundamentalisme dan Upaya Radikalisasi. Jurnal Religa, Vol 13(No 1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bachtiar Dwi Kurniawan, David Efendi, Alam Mahadika, Moch Edward Trias Pahlevi, Azka Abdi Amrurobbi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Sociología y tecnociencia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Sociología y Tecnociencia.
