Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide in knowledge transfer studies: the use of QCA in the exploration of university-industry relationships
the use of QCA in the exploration of university-industry relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2022.154-186Keywords:
Knowledge transfer, universities, SMEs, local innovation systems, QCA.Abstract
This article uses Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to study knowledge-transfer processes that are difficult to observe due to the absence of standardized data sources. It examines university–industry relationships and focuses on firms’ chances of developing R&D projects and services within a local innovation system. The article makes methodological and substantive contributions. First, micro- and meso-level qualitative approaches move towards the tradition of quantitative studies on science through a process that illustrates the construction of quantifiable dimensions and their possibilities of analysis. Second, analysis reveals the conditioning factors that influence non-R&D-intensive small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) into using university knowledge. The conclusions highlight the possibilities of this methodology’s cross-fertilization with other approaches in the empirical study of science and innovation.
Downloads
References
REFERENCIAS
Adame-Sánchez, C., González-Cruz, T. F., y Martínez-Fuentes, C. (2016). Do firms implement work–life balance policies to benefit their workers or themselves? Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5519-5523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.164.
Álvarez-Coque, J. M. G., Mas-Verdú, F., y Roig-Tierno, N. (2017). Technological innovation versus non-technological innovation: different conditions in different regional contexts? Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1955-1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0394-2.
Benneworth, P. (Ed.) (2019). Universities and regional economic development. Engaging with the periphery, Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168357.
Borgman, C. (2015). Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Scholarship in the Networked World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001.
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., y Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8.
Brown, R. (2016). Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 189-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1145575.
Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., Castro-Herrero, L., Engesser, S. and Brüggemann, M. (2016). Building empirical typologies with QCA: Toward a classification of media systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 209-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215626567.
Buganza, T., Colombo, G., y Landoni, P. (2014). Small and medium enterprises’ collaborations with universities for new product development: An analysis of the different phases. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(1), 69–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2013-0160.
Caliari, T. and Chiarini, T. (2018). Analysis of scientific research groups with greater productive applicability in Brazil: capacities and interactions with firms. Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, 45(82), 71-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.82.864.
Cámara de Comercio de Córdoba (2017). Actividades económicas. Recuperado de http://camaracordoba.com/es/servicio-de-certificaciones/Como-ser-competitivo.
Cobo-Benita, J. R., Rodríguez-Segura, E., Ortiz-Marcos, I., y Ballesteros-Sánchez, L. (2016). Innovation projects performance: Analyzing the impact of organizational characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1357-1360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.107.
Cohen, W. M., y Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective onlearning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
Cooper, B.,y Glaesser, J. (2016). Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: an illustration from the sociology of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 445-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1033799.
Copus, A., Skuras, D., y Tsegenidi, K. (2008). Innovation and peripherality: An empirical comparative study of SMEs in six European Union member countries. Economic Geography, 84(1), 51-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.x.
Corral de Zubielqui, G., Jones, J., Seet, P. S., y Lindsay, N. (2015). Knowledge transfer between actors in the innovation system: a study of higher education institutions (HEIS) and SMES. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(3/4), 436-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2013-0152.
Corral de Zubielqui, G., Lindsay, N., Lindsay, W., y Jones, J. (2018). Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs, 53(1), 145-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0046-0.
Curado, C., Muñoz-Pascual, L., y Galende, J. (2018). Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 206-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.056.
Dada, O., y Fogg, H. (2016). Organizational learning, entrepreneurial orientation, and the role of university engagement in SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 86-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614542852.
Dusa, Adrian (2019). QCA with R. A Comprehensive Resource. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75668-4.
Edge, D. (1995). Reinventing the wheel. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen and T. Pinch, 3-23. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fan, D., Cui, L., Li, Y., y Zhu, C. J. (2016). Localized learning by emerging multinational enterprises in developed host countries: A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese foreign direct investment in Australia. International Business Review, 25(1), 187-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.12.005.
Fan, D., Li, Y., y Chen, L. (2017). Configuring innovative societies: The crossvergent role of cultural and institutional varieties. Technovation, 66, 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.05.003.
Fernández, R., Revuelto, L., y Simón, V. (2018). Survival of new social ventures. An approach based on qualitative comparative analysis fsQCA. CIRIEC-ESPAÑA Revista de Economía Pública Social y Cooperativa, (92), 183-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.92.10735.
Fernández-Esquinas, M., y Pinto, H. (2014). The Role of Universities in Urban Regeneration: Reframing the Analytical Approach, European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1462-1483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.791967.
Fernández-Esquinas, M., Pinto, H., Pérez-Yruela, M., y Santos-Pereira, T. (2016). Tracing the flows of knowledge transfer: Latent dimensions and determinants of university–industry interactions in peripheral innovation systems, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13, 266-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.013.
Fernández-Esquinas, M., Pedraza Rodríguez, J.A., Muñoz Benito, R., y Sánchez-Rodríguez, M.I. (2019). Relaciones universidad-empresa y transferencia de conocimiento: Un diagnóstico del sistema local de innovación, Córdoba: Consejo Social de la Universidad de Córdoba / UCO Press. Obtenido en: https://www.uco.es/servicios/ucopress/images/librosgratuitos/978-84-9927-444-7/ebook.html.
Franklin, M. I. (2012). Understanding Research. Coping with the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118863.
Gherardini, A, y Nucciotti, A. (2017). Yesterday’s giants and invisible colleges of today. A study on the ‘knowledge transfer’ scientific domain, Scientometrics, 112(1), 255–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2394-y.
Goertz, G., y Starr, H. (2003). The substantive importance of necessary condition hypotheses. Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications, 65-94.
Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2017). Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned?. Political Communication, 34(2), 155-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158.
Huggins, R., Johnston, A., y Stride, C. (2012). Knowledge networks and universities: Locational and organisational aspects of knowledge transfer interactions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(7-8), 475-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.618192.
Humprecht, E. and Büchel, F. (2013). More of the same or marketplace of opinions? A cross-national comparison of diversity in online news reporting. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(4), 436-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213497595.
Kraus, S., Burtscher, J., Niemand, T., Roig-Tierno, N., y Syrjä, P. (2017). Configurational paths to social performance in SMEs: The interplay of innovation, sustainability, resources and achievement motivation. Sustainability, 9(10), 1828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101828.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kwiotkowska, A. (2018). Barriers to the development of spin-offs: a fuzzy-set-theoretic approach. Operations Research and Decisions, 28(4), 31-46.
Leydesdorff, L. (1989). The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies, Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 333-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017058.
Li, R., Tao, Q., y Wang, Y. (2015, July). A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of innovation network attributes. In 2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Marcos-Marne, H. (2016). Autonomist and secessionist parties in post-communist democracies. Structural and institutional factors in the study of a dynamic phenomenon. National Identities, 18(4), 379-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2015.1075482.
Martin, R., y Simmie, J. (2008). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation, Management Policy & Practice, 10(2-3), 183–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.183.
Meuer, J., Rupietta, C., y Backes-Gellner, U. (2015). Layers of co-existing innovation systems. Research policy, 44(4), 888-910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.013.
Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., y Schmoch, U. (2004). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S & T Systems. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9.
Oana, I. E. and Schneider, C. Q. (2018). SetMethods: an add-on R package for advanced QCA. R J. XX, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-031.
Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., y Lockett, N. (2013). Shifting sands: Regional perspectives on the role of social capital in supporting open innovation through knowledge transfer and exchange with small and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 31(3), 296-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612467659.
Pappas, N. (2018). Hotel decision-making during multiple crises: A chaordic perspective. Tourism Management, 68, 450-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.04.009.
Parida, V., Patel, P. C., Frishammar, J., y Wincent, J. (2017). Managing the front-end phase of process innovation under conditions of high uncertainty. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1983-2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0376-4.
Pastor, J. M., Aldás, J., Serrano, L., Benages, E., y Soler, Á. (2018). Estudio de la contribución de la universidad de Córdoba a su entorno económico y social. IVIE.
Peris-Ortiz, M., Devece-Carañana, C. A., y Navarro-García, A. (2018). Organizational learning capability and open innovation. Management Decision, 56(6), 1217-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0173.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Brostrom, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
Pinto, H. Fernández-Esquinas, M., y Uyarra, E. (2014). Universities and Knowledge Intensive Bussiness Services (KIBS) as sources of knowledge for innovative firms in peripheral regions. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1873-1891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.857396.
Poorkavoos, M., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., y Ramanathan, R. (2016). Identifying the configurational paths to innovation in SMEs: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5843-5854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.067.
Ragin, C. (1987). The Comparative Method. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
Ramos-Vielba, I., Fernández-Esquinas, M., y Espinosa-de-los-Monteros, E. (2009). Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics, 84(3), 649–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0113-z.
Ramos-Vielba, I., y Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2012). Beneath the tip of the Iceberg. Exploring the multiple forms of university-industry linkages, Higuer Education, 64, 237-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9491-2.
Rasmussen, E., y Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002.
Rihoux, B., Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A. and Rezsöhazy, I. (2013). From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 175-184.
Rihoux, B., y Marx, A. (2013). QCA, 25 Years after “The Comparative Method” Mapping, Challenges, and Innovations - Mini-Symposium. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 167-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912468269.
Schulte, F. (2018). The More, The Better? Assessing the Scope of Regional Autonomy as a Key Condition for Ethnic Conflict Regulation. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 25(1), 84-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02501001.
Schneider, C. Q., y C. Wagemann (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244.
Tho, N. D., y Trang, N. T. M. (2015). Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1332-1340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.003.
Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., y Pittaway, L. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium‐sized firms: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 257-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x.
Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic management journal, 21(9), 925-939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I.
van Raan, Anthony F.J. (Ed.) (1988). Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Venturini, T., Jensen, P., y Latour, B. (2015). Fill in the gap: A new alliance for social and natural sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18, 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2729.
Warren, J. (2017). “The way things get done around here…” Exploring spatial biographies, social policy and governance in the North East of England. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 37(11-12), 655-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2016-0048.
Woltmann, S.L., y Alkærsig, L. (2018).Tracing university–industry knowledge transfer through a text mining approach. Scientometrics, 117(1), 449–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2849-9.
Woltmann, S.L. (2012). Synergy or separation mode: the relationship between the academic research and the knowledge-transfer activities of Korean academics. Scientometrics, 90(1), 177–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0513-8.
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., y Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021.
Wyatt, S., y Balmer, B. (2007). Home on the Range. What and Where is the Middle in Science and Technology Studies?, Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(6), 619-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306085.
Wyatt, S., Milojević, S., Woo Park, Han, y Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Quantitative and Qualitative STS: The intellectual and practical contributions of scientometrics. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588336.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-02-17 (3)
- 2022-02-17 (2)
- 2022-02-11 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 M. Isabel Sánchez-Rodríguez, Manuel Fernámdez-Esquinas, José Antonio Pedraza-Rodriguez, Rocío Muñoz-Benito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Sociología y tecnociencia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Sociología y Tecnociencia.
