Communicating advances in technology and robotics: a gender issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2022.73-92Keywords:
androcentrism and new technologies, women and new technologies, communication and gender, gender stereotypes.Abstract
This paper is aimed at exploring from an intersectional gender perspective the evolution of Spanish media discourse in science and technology news. An intersectional feminist qualitative analysis is made of a sample of science and technology articles published in 2020 and 2021 in the digital editions of El País, El Mundo, and La Vanguardia, to identify and study the stereotypes and patterns of gender representation and explain the underlying power relations (Cucklanz, 2016). The main findings point out that the language with which technological progress is reported is still masculine: the generic masculine continues to be used in the wording and also in the images; it is found also that the future constructed by much of this information is still loaded with marked stereotypes of femininity; in contrast, we found some other news that offer female referents who a few years ago were not interviewed in the media as experts in science and technology. We conclude the necessity of gender mainstreaming training for journalism and communication professionals, designers of these technologies and managers of their diffusion. A social debate and ethical and political reflection are needed regarding the effects, not exclusively gender-related, of the new human-machine relations.
Downloads
References
Balsamo, Anne (1988). Reading cyborgs writing feminism. Communication. 10(3-4), pp. 331-344.
Cucklanz, Lisa (2016). Feminist Theory in Communication. En The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (eds. K.B. Jensen; E.W. Rothenbuhler; J.D. Pooley; R.T. Craig). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect157
D’Ignazio, Catherine y Klein, Lauren F. (2020). Data Feminism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Franco, Yanna G. & Blanco-Ruiz, Marian (2021). Calidad editorial y científica con perspectiva feminista: El caso de Comunicación y Género. En Escritura académica con perspectiva de género. Propuestas desde la comunicación científica (pp. 121-142). Sevilla. Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.
Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3), pp. 575–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Haraway, Donna (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism In The Late Twentieth Century. En Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 149-181). New York: Routledge.
Harding, Sandra (1987). Is There a Feminist Method? En Sandra Harding (Ed.). Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
IBM (2020). La carrera mundial por la Inteligencia Artificial. Informe elaborado por Morning Consult para IBM.
Morning Consult & IBM (2020). From roadblock to scale: The global sprint towards AI. Disponible en: https://filecache.mediaroom.com/mr5mr_ibmnews/183710/Roadblock-to-Scale-exec-summary.pdf (Última consulta: 6 de junio de 2021).
Noble, Safiya (2017). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
PwC (2020). Sizing the prize. Disponible en: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/data-and-analytics/publications/artificial-intelligence-study.html (Última consulta: 6 de junio de 2021).
Sandoval Martín, T. ; Sainz-de-Baranda Andújar, C. & La-Rosa Barrolleta, L. (2021). La expansión de los sesgos de género con la inteligencia artificial. En Estudios de Género en tiempos de amenaza (pp. 566-583). Madrid. Dykinson S.L.
Smith, Genevieve & Rustagi, Ishita (2020). Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence: An Equity Fluent Leadership Playbook. Berkeley HAAS Center for Equity, Gender and Leadership, July 2020. Disponible en: https://haas.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/UCB_Playbook_R10_V2_spreads2.pdf
Tajahuerce, I.; Mateos, C. & Melero, R. (2017). Análisis feminista de las propuestas pos humanas de la tecnología patriarcal. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 135, 123-141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i135.3193
Tajahuerce, I. & Mateos, C. (2016). Simulaciones sexo genéricas, bebés reborn y muñecas eróticas hiperrealistas. Revista Opción. Universidad de Zulia, 32(81), 189-212. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31048807010
Tajahuerce-Ángel I. & Franco, Yanna G. (2019). Periódicos españoles e información sobre robótica e inteligencia artificial: una aproximación a imaginarios y realidades desde una perspectiva de género. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, nº 48, 15 marzo 2019 -15 julio 2019, pp. 173-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2019.48.173-189
Toupin, Sophie (2018). Decolonial and Intersectional Feminist Afterthoughts EASST Review. Volume 37(4). Disponible en: https://easst.net/article/decolonial-and-intersectional-feminist-afterthoughts/#authors (Última consulta: 25 de febrero de 2021).
UNESCO (2020). Artificial intelligence and gender equality: key findings of UNESCO’s Global Dialogue. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374174 (Última consulta el 5 de junio de 2021).
Wajcman, Judy (2006). El Tecnofeminismo. Madrid. Cátedra.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yanna G. Franco, Isabel Tajahuerce-Ángel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Sociología y tecnociencia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Sociología y Tecnociencia.
