Grassroots actors and the cultural response to urban marginalization in Indonesia

Authors

  • Rozuli Ahmad Imron Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang , https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-282X
  • Purba Danu Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang , https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-8030
  • Nugroho Arief Budi Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang ,
  • Sopyan Abdul Rachman Reseacher at Yayasan Pendidikan Politik & Peradaban, Malang , Reseacher at Yayasan Pendidikan Politik & Peradaban, Malang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1629-2039

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/t5bgvg85

Keywords:

Grassroots actors, social capital, villagers' literacy, society

Abstract

Population density and lower class marginalization due to the development of elite areas have alienated a community over its identity. The driving actors behind every social change exist, and they utilize a change through the villagers’ literacy power. Mainstreaming views on the actors’ active roles in social change essentially impact knowledge in the sociology of ethnic and cultural society. This study aims to describe the hidden actors behind the phenomenon of cultural movements that exist and develop national and international relations. This paper applies qualitative data collected in a participatory manner through interviews with key actors in Kampung Cempluk Festival. Focus group discussions were conducted with actors involved in every festival held by the community. Informants selected by snowball were then interviewed about their perceptions, motivations, and a value embodiment process. Researchers did the literature study through writings, releases, newspapers, mass media opinions, and several previous researches. The results indicate that alienation will foster citizens' critical awareness of development and cultural values impacts. It is supported by driving actors who can read the potentials and opportunities in society. Thus, this research becomes the basis for policymakers in planning development which should prioritize a cultural approach and consider the threat of hidden power loss in society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahlborg, H., Ruiz-Mercado, I., Molander, S., & Masera, O. (2019). Bringing technology into social-ecological systems research-Motivations for a socio-technical-ecological systems approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072009

Akbar, A., & Noviani, N. (2019). Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Perkembangan Teknologi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pgri Palembang.

Aprianto, R. (2016). Proses Kebertahanan Kampung Petempen Dalam Perkembangan Kota. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v12i3.12909

Ardiansyah, M. N. (2019). Rembug Budaya Kampung Cempluk Festival ke-9, Nostalgia Perjuangan Masa Lalu. https://www.timesindonesia.co.id/read/news/230123/rembug-budaya-kampung-cempluk-festival-ke9-nostalgia-perjuangan-masa-lalu

Azka Nur Medha. (2017). Dukungan Modal Sosial Dalam Membangun Kolektifitas Masyaraat Untuk Beradaptasi Terhadap Fenomena Gentrifikasi di Kawasan Medokan Semampir. Tugas Akhir, PWK ITS.

Clark, E. (2004). The order and simplicity of gentrification ication-a political challenge. In Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392089

Coburn D. (2000). Income inequality, social cohesion, and the health status of populations. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 135–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00445-1

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the creation of Human Capital Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure (1988). The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://www.crcresearch.org/files-crcresearch/File/coleman_88.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Merrill Prentice Hall.

Edwards, R. C. (1975). The Social Relations of Production in The Firm and Labor Market Structure. Politics & Society, 5(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927500500104

Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? In Journal of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X99000215

Getz, D., Andersson, T., & Carlsen, J. (2010). Festival management studies: Developing a framework and priorities for comparative and cross-cultural research. International Journal of Event and Festival Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17852951011029298

Gibson, C., Waitt, G., Walmsley, J., & Connell, J. (2010). Cultural festivals and economic development in nonmetropolitan Australia. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X09354382

Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958

Halim, A. K., & Jamaluddin, M. (2022). Motivation And Values Contained In The Tahlilan Tradition. Risalah, 8(1), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.31943/jurnal

Harahap, F. R. (2013). Dampak Urbanisasi Bagi Perkembangan Kota Di Indonesia. Society. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.40

Hartik, A. (2021). Festival Kampung Cempuk 2021 di Malang Kembali Digelar Virtual. https://travel.kompas.com/read/2021/09/11/140232827/festival-kampung-cempuk-2021-di-malang-kembali-digelar-virtual?page=all

Iqbal, L. O. S. M., Surya, B., & Syafri, S. (2021). Kutub Pertumbuhan Dan Gentrifikasi Pada Kawasan Pinggiran Kota Makassar. Urban and Regional Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.35965/ursj.v3i1.607

Jaman, B. (2018). Exploring The Values Of Tahlilan Tradition For Development Of Social Interaction Topic In Social Studies Education Learning (Descriptive Study of Analysis in Gintung Ranjeng Village of Cirebon Regency). International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 2(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs.v2i2.10157

Kleider, H., & Toubeau, S. (2022). Public policy in multi-level systems: A new research agenda for the study of regional-level policy. Regional & Federal Studies, 32(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.2018681

Laily, N. (2020). Teori Sosial Empirik (M. Hidayaturahman (ed.)). edulitera. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Hidayaturrahman/publication/341276119_Teori_SoSial_empirik/links/5eb77533a6fdcc1f1dcb2505/Teori-SoSial-empirik.pdf#page=161

Ledoh, L. Y., Satria, A., & Hidayat, R. (2019). Livelihoods Vulnerability of Communities in Coastal City to Climate Variability (Case Study in Kupang City). Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 9(3), 758–770. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.3.758-770

Mudiarta, K. G. (2017). Jaringan Sosial (Networks) dalam Pengembangan Sistem dan Usaha Agribisnis: Perspektif Teori dan Dinamika Studi Kapital Sosial. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v27n1.2009.1-12

Nana. (2017). Festival Kampung Cempluk Ditangani Penuh Karang Taruna. https://www.malangtimes.com/baca/14393/20160917/173146/festival-kampung-cempluk-ditangani-penuh-karang-taruna

Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2000). Social Research Methods, Quatitative and Quantitative Approaches (Fourth). Allyn and Bacon. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Teaching Sociology (Vol. 30, Issue 3). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

Neuman, William L. (1991). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). The Prosperous Community. The American Prospect.

Raharti, R., Laras, T., & Oktavianti, O. (2021). Model Ketimpangan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi Dan Bisnis. https://doi.org/10.33059/jseb.v12i2.2422

Redy, E. P. (2017). Liputan Kampung Cempluk Kab.Malang di TVONE edisi Inspirasi 29 maret 2017. http://japungnusantara.org/liputan-kampung-cempluk-kab-malang-di-tvone-edisi-inspirasi-29-maret-2017/

Redy, E. P. (2018). Kampung Cempluk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7651MBSvrQA

Shaw, K. (2008). Gentrification: What it is, why it is, and what can be done about it. Geography Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00156.x

Shrivastava, P., Stafford Smith, M., O’Brien, K., & Zsolnai, L. (2020). Transforming Sustainability Science to Generate Positive Social and Environmental Change Globally. One Earth, 2(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010

Sirait, S. (2016). Religious Attitudes of Theological Tradisional In The Modern Muslim Community Study on Tahlilan in Kotagede Sangkot Sirait tahlilan . According to Muhammadiyah , tahlilan tradition is another form communities . Muhammadiyah teaching standards consider. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 10(02), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2016.10.2.237-260

Sondakh, S. I., & Gunawan, I. (2019). Gentrifikasi dan Kota: Kasus Kawasan Cikini-Kalipasir-Gondangdia. JSRW (Jurnal Senirupa Warna). https://doi.org/10.36806/jsrw.v7i2.75

Susilo, A. A. (2021, November 12). Kota Batu dalam Bayang-Bayang Gentrifikasi. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5807467/kota-batu-dalam-bayang-bayang-gentrifikasi

Syahra, R. (2003). Modal sosial: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 5(1), 1–22. http://www.jurnalmasyarakatdanbudaya.com/index.php/jmb/article/view/256

Downloads

Published

2026-01-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Grassroots actors and the cultural response to urban marginalization in Indonesia. (2026). Sociología Y Tecnociencia, 16(1), 194-212. https://doi.org/10.24197/t5bgvg85