Formas intermedias y cambio tecnológico: Explorando los vínculos entre tecnología y topología
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/st.2.2022.96-123Palabras clave:
tecnología, cambio Tecnológico, topología, ontologías CTSResumen
El estudio de la tecnología y el cambio tecnológico es un campo dinámico donde convergen diversas disciplinas de las ciencias sociales y las humanidades. Es posible encontrar varias ontologías que incorporan referentes topológicos como metáforas heurísticas y dispositivos metodológicos simples en los estudios tecnológicos. El artículo examina dos conceptos topológicos relacionados, continuidad y convergencia sustentados en las nociones de acumulación de conocimiento y de combinación de tecnologías preexistentes, para llegar a las nociones de convergencia e inflación. El artículo concluye con algunas pautas para futuras investigaciones que exploren en términos formales el potencial de la topología en los estudios de la tecnología y del cambio tecnológico.
Descargas
Referencias
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review(50), 41-47.
Aluja, J. G., & Lafuente, A. M. G. (2012). Topology. In Towards an Advanced Modelling of Complex Economic Phenomena: Pretopological and Topological Uncertainty Research Tools (pp. 71-106). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604-633. doi:10.2307/2393511
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The Nature of Technology. New York, USA.: Free Press.
Basalla, G. (2011[1988]). La Evolución de la Tecnología. Barcelona, España: Editorial Crítica.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., & Kaur, J. (2009). Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks. Journal of Infometrics, 3(3), 210-221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.001
Brem, A., Nylund, P. A., & Schuster, G. (2016). Innovation and de facto standardisation: The influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation, 50-51, 79-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.002
Cerulli, G. (2014). The Impact of Technological Capabilities on Invention: An Investigation Based on Country Responsiveness Scores. World Development, 59, 147-165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.019
Cusumano, M. A., Mylonadis, Y., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1992). Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta. The Business History Review, 66(1), 51-94. doi:10.2307/3117053
Dafoe, A. (2015). On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(6), 1047-1076. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
Dotson, T. (2015). Technological Determinism and Permissionless Innovation as Technocratic Governing Mentalities: Psychocultural Barriers to the Democratization of Technology. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 98-120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.009
Elder-Vass, D. (2015). Disassembling Actor-network Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 45(1), 100-121. doi:10.1177/0048393114525858
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. doi:10.1177/05390184030423002
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy(37), 1417-1435. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003
Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change. Management Science, 63(3), 791-817. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366
Geels, F. W. (2009). Foundational ontologies and multi-paradigm analysis, applied to the socio-technical transition from mixed farming to intensive pig husbandry (1930–1980). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(7), 805-832. doi:10.1080/09537320903182280
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495-510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
Gilfillan, S. C. (1952). The Prediction of Technical Change. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 34(4), 368-385. doi:10.2307/1926864
Gilfillan, S. C. (1970[1935]). The Sociology of Invention. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
Godin, B. (2010). Innovation Without the Word: William F. Ogburn's Contribution to the Study of Technological Innovation. Minerva, 48(3), 277-307. doi:10.1007/s11024-010-9151-1
Hacklin, F., Marxt, C., & Fahrni, F. (2010). An evolutionary perspective on convergence: inducing a stage model of inter-industry innovation. International Journal of Technology Management 49(1/2/3), 220-249. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2010.029419
Hagan, S. M. (2007). The Imagined And The Concrete: What is an Artifact? . Artifact, 1(1), 23-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460600610855
Høyer, K. G. (2008). The history of alternative fuels in transportation: The case of electric and hybrid cars. Utilities Policy, 16(2), 63-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.11.001
Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 28-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700102
Kudina, O., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2018). Ethics from Within: Google Glass, the Collingridge Dilemma, and the Mediated Value of Privacy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(2), 291-314. doi:10.1177/0162243918793711
Kuo, C. I., Wu, C. H., & Lin, B. W. (2019). Gaining from scientific knowledge: the role of knowledge accumulation and knowledge combination. R&D Management, 49(2), 252-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12322
Larrión, J. (2019). Teoría del actor-red. Síntesis y evaluación de la deriva postsocial de Bruno Latour / Actor-Network Theory. Synthesis and Evaluation of Bruno Latour’s Post-Social Drift. Revista Española de Sociología, 28(2), 323-341. doi:10.22325/fes/res.2019.03
Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95-119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863
Manetti, M. (2015). Topology. Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer.
Marres, N. (2012). On Some Uses and Abuses of Topology in the Social Analysis of Technology (Or the Problem with Smart Meters). Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4-5), 288-310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412454460
Mason, W. W. (1931). Trevithick's First Rail Locomotive. Transactions of the Newcomen Society, 12(1), 85-103. doi:10.1179/tns.1931.007
Metcalfe, S., & Ramlogan, R. (2008). Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(2), 433-446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021
Moore, G. H. (2007). The evolution of the concept of homeomorphism. Historia Mathematica, 34(3), 333-343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2006.07.006
Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy, 35(7), 925-952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011
Nachum, L., & Keeble, D. (2003). Neo-Marshallian Clusters and Global Networks: The Linkages of Media Firms in Central London. Long Range Planning 36(5), 459-480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(03)00114-6
Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265-272. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00140-8
Niemi, P., Huiskonen, J., & Kärkkäinen, H. (2009). Understanding the knowledge accumulation process—Implications for the adoption of inventory management techniques. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 160-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.028
Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch, Inc.
Pel, B. (2014). Intersections in system innovation: a nested-case methodology to study co-evolving innovation journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(3), 307-320. doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.850656
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Saviotti, P. P. (2018[1991]). The Role of Variety in Economic and Technological Development. In P. P. Saviotti & S. Metcalfe (Eds.), Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change (Vol. 44, pp. 172-208). London & New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group. Harwood Academic Publisher.
Saviotti, P. P., & Metcalfe, S. (2018[1991]). Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change (Vol. 44). London & New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group. Harwood Academic Publisher.
Schiffer, M. B. (2002). Studying Technological Differentiation: The Case of 18th-Century Electrical Technology. American Anthropologist, 104(4), 1148-1161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3567103
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). The Art of Standards Wars. California Management Review, 41(2), 8-32. doi:10.2307/41165984
Shi, X., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Inbound open innovation and radical innovation capability: The moderating role of organisational inertia. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(3), 581-597. doi:10.1108/JOCM-07-2017-0262
Solée, R. V., Valverde, S., Casals, M. R., Kauffman, S. A., Farmer, D., & Eldredge, N. (2013). The evolutionary ecology of technological innovations. Complexity, 18(4), 15-27. doi:10.1002/cplx.21436
Sood, A., & Tellis, G. J. (2005). Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 152-168. doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.3.152.66361
Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for socio-technical change. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 703-750. doi:10.1177/0306312717709363
Spulber, D. F. (2013). INNOVATION ECONOMICS: THE INTERPLAY AMONG TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS, COMPETITIVE CONDUCT, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 9(4), 777-825. doi:10.1093/joclec/nht041
Utterback, J. M. (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Valverde, S., Solée, R. V., Bedau, M. A., & Packard, N. (2007). Topology and evolution of technology innovation networks. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 76(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.056118
Volti, R. (2004). William F. Ogburn "Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature". [Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature, William F. Ogburn]. Technology and Culture, 45(2), 396-405. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40060750
Waldmann, S. (2014). Topology. An Introduction Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer
Descargas
Publicado
Versiones
- 2022-09-11 (3)
- 2022-09-11 (2)
- 2022-09-11 (1)
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Victor Gomez-Valenzuela
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todos los trabajos publicados en la revista Sociología y Tecnociencia se distribuyen bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Los autores continúan como propietarios de sus trabajos, y pueden volver a publicar sus artículos en otro medio sin tener que solicitar autorización, siempre y cuando indiquen que el trabajo fue publicado originariamente en la revista Sociología y Tecnociencia.
