¿Ha sido un milagro? Brevísimo repaso al debate contemporáneo del no-miracles argument en el realismo científico.

Authors

  • Yulfren Jhonattan González Ramírez University of Valladolid image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/trim.18.2020.61-70

Keywords:

Filosofía Ciencia; Realismo; Anti-realismo; no-milagro

Abstract

Philosophy as the mother of all disciplines, reflects on the events that happen around the human being, the philosophy of science, meanwhile, deals with the relationship between the scientific ethos and its knowledge. Scientific theories allow man (anthropologically understood) to understand the phenomena to which we are exposed and give validity to the arguments that are closest to the reality of the facts. This paper reviews the controversy between realists and anti-realists about the " no-miracle argument" (miracles argument, in Spanish) raised by Hilary Putman.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-23

Issue

No. 18 (2020)

Section

Artículos

License

The articles published at TRIM. Tordesillas: Revista de investigación multidisciplinar will have a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in TRIM. Tordesillas: Revista de investigación multidisciplinar.

How to Cite

¿Ha sido un milagro? Brevísimo repaso al debate contemporáneo del no-miracles argument en el realismo científico. (2020). TRIM. Tordesillas, Revista De investigación Multidisciplinar, 18, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.24197/trim.18.2020.61-70