Impregnando la pedagogía del entrenamiento del juego modificado en el enfoque centrado en el sentido del juego con la teoría de las affordances

  • Joss Rankin College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University
  • Shane Pill College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University
  • Terry Magias College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University
Palabras clave: Entrenamiento, sentido del juego, affordances, limitadores-condicionantes, Touch Football


El enfoque del entrenamiento centrado en el sentido de juego se basa en expectativas de prácticas basadas-en-el-juego en las que el propio juego (o la forma del juego) se convierten en el foco y punto de partida de la práctica. La teoría de las affordances –un pilar conceptual del modelo ecológico de la percepción y la acción en el deporte, conducente a una perspectiva de diseño de juegos mediante “limitadores” (constraints-led)– proporciona una base para la comprensión de la modificación y adaptación de los juegos en el marco pedagógico del enfoque basado en el sentido del juego. Repasamos la teoría de las affordances a fin de mostrar una práctica de aprendizaje mediante “limitadores” en Touch Football. Concluimos con una propuesta de diseño de juego mediante “limitadores”, como una lógica ejemplificación de los supuestos de la práctica basada en el juego desde el enfoque del sentido del juego. Este artículo muestra el potencial de la teoría de las affordances como medio para el análisis de la dinámica de trabajo del Touch Football y, con ello, pretende enriquecer una perspectiva del entrenamiento deportivo basada en el sentido del juego.


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.


Araújo, D. (2007). Promoting ecologies where performers exhibit expert interactions. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(1), 73–77.

Araujo, D. & Davids, K. (2016). Team synergies in sport: Theory and measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1449. Retrieved 15 March, 2017, from doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01449

Araujo, D., Fonseca, C., Davids, K., Garganta, J., Volossovitch, A., Brandao, R., & Krebs, R. (2010). The role of ecological constraints on expertise development. Talent Development and Excellence, 2(2), 165-179. Retrieved 15 March, 2017, from

Australian Sports Commission. (1996). Game Sense perceptions and actions research report. Belconnen, ACT: Australian Sports Commission.

Australian Sports Commission. (1999). Game sense cards: 30 games to develop thinking players. Belconnen, ACT: Australian Sports Commission.

Australian Sports Commission. (2009). Yalunga traditional Indigenous games. Belconnen, ACT: Australian Sports Commission.

Bhaskaran, V. (2003). Level III hockey coaching course. Bangalore, India: Karnataka State Hockey Association.

Brown, T. B. J., Carlson, T.B., & Hastie, P. A. (2004). A comparison of rugby seasons presented in traditional and sport education formats. European Physical Education Review, 10, 199–214. Retrieved 15 March, 2017, from doi: 0.1177/1356336X04044071

Charlesworth, R. (1994). Designer games. Sport Coach, 17(4), 30-33.

Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181-195. doi:

Davids, K., Araujo, D., Vilar, L., Renshaw, I., & Pinder, R. (2013). An ecological dynamics approach to skill acquisition: implications for development of talent in sport. Talent Development & Excellence. 5(1), 21-34.

Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics.

Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Glazier, P. (2005). Movement models from sports reveal fundamental insights into coordination processes. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 33(1), 36–42. Retrieved 15 September, 2016 from

den Duyn, N. (1996). Why it makes sense to play games. Sports Coach, 19(3), 6-9

den Duyn, N. (1997). Game Sense - developing thinking players workbook. Belconnen, ACT: Australian Sports Commission.

Dicks, M., & Upton, M. (2017). Integrating decision-making into training. In R. Thelwell, C. Harwood & I. Greenless (Eds.), The Psychology of sports coaching (pp. 249-264). New York: Routledge.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gray, S., & Hall, E. (2015). Coaching tactics. In C. Nash (Eds.), Practical sports coaching (pp. 148-174). New York: Routledge.

Hopper, T. (2011). Game-as-teacher: Modification by adaptation in learning through game-play. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 3–21. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2011.9730348

Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. New York: Routledge.

Launder, A. (2001). Play practice: The games approach to teaching and coaching sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Light, R. (2005). Making sense of chaos: Australian coaches talk about game sense. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 169–182). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Light, R. (2006). Game sense: Innovation or just good coaching? Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 39(1), 8-19.

Light, R. (2008). Complex learning theory-its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: Implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 21–37. Retrieved 15 September, 2016 from
doi: 10.1123/jtpe.27.1.21

Light, R. (2013). Game sense: Pedagogy for performance, participation and enjoyment. New York: Routledge.

Light, R. L., Harvey, S., & Mouchet, A. (2012). Improving ‘at-action’ decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach. Sport, Education and Society, 1–18, iFirst Article. Retrieved 15 September, 2016 from doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.665803

Magias, T., Pill, S., Elliott, S., & Bell, E. (2015). An application on non-linear learning in Netball: Game sense coaching. Active and Healthy Magazine, 22(2/3), 35-40.

Pigott, B. (1982). A psychological basis for trends in games teaching. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 17–22.

Pill, S. (2006). Teaching games for understanding. Sports Coach, 29(2), 27-29.

Pill, S. (2007). Play with Purpose. Hindmarsh, SA: ACHPER Publications.

Pill, S. (2012). Teaching game sense in soccer. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &Dance, 83(3), 42-52. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2012.10598746

Pill, S. (2013). Play with Purpose: Game sense to sport literacy. Hindmarsh, SA: ACHPER Publications.

Pill, S. (2014). Informing game sense pedagogy with constraints-led theory for coaching in Australian football. Sports Coaching Review, Published online 14 March, 2014. doi: 10.1080/21640629.2014.890778

Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Button, C., Renshaw, I., & Araujo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 146-155. Retrieved 15 September, 2016 from doi:

Schembri, G. (2005). Playing for life: Coaches’ guide. Canberra, Australia: Australian Sports Commission.

Smith, W. (2016). Fundamental movement skills and fundamental game skills are complimentary pairs and should be taught in complementary ways at all stages of skill development. Sport, Education and Society, 21(3), 431-442. Retrieved (15 May, 2017). doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.927757

Snapp-Childs, W., Wilson, A., & Bingham, G. P. (2015). Transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual rhythmic movement coordination; Transfer is a function of task dynamic. Experimental Brain Research, 233(7), 2225-2238. Retrieved 15 September, 2016 from

Turvey, M. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187. doi:

Walsh, J., Heazlewood, I. T., & Climstein, M. (2012). Modelling touch football (touch rugby) as a Markov process. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 6(4), 203-212.

Wilson, A. D., Weightman, A., Bingham, G. P., & Zhu, Q. (2016). Using task dynamics to quantify the affordances of throwing for long distance and accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 965-981. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000199