The multiple and the diverse. Prolegomena to a theory of world literature

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/h62gg437

Keywords:

comparative literature, interliterary theory, ectopic literatura, cultural globalization, polysystmes, world literature

Abstract

For a long time, academic disdain for comparative literature, or comparativism, stemmed from the same reason why the canon of other literatures was disregarded within the fields of national literatures studies. This article proposes a critical review of comparative literature throughout its history and a subsequent theoretical exploration of what it means today, in the cultural context of globalization, to speak of comparative literature, general literature, or world literature. This is an era, as the article examines, in which comparative literature can perhaps only be understood as a problem, and world literature as one of its possible solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Juan Francisco Ferré, University of Malaga

    PhD in Hispanic Studies and Full Professor of Literary Theory and Comparative Literature at the University of Málaga (UMA), with two six-year research periods recognized by the ANECA (2009-2021). Between 2005 and 2012, he was a visiting professor at Brown University (United States), teaching Spanish and Latin American narrative, film, and literature. In 2006, his doctoral thesis ("Allegories of Postmodernity: Juan Goytisolo's Terminal Novel") received the highest possible grade from the examining board (summa cum laude, unanimously) chaired by the distinguished Claudio Guillén. From May 1, 2009, to April 30, 2011, I held a MICINN postdoctoral fellowship managed by FECYT and carried out at Brown University as an R&D project (“Transatlantic Hypertextuality: Contemporary Narrative and New Technologies”). Since 2018, I have been a member of the Department of Spanish Philology at the University of Málaga (UMA), in the Area of ​​Literary Theory and Comparative Literature, teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean literature in the East Asian Studies degree program. In 2022, I published the monograph “Yin and Yang: The Power of Eros in the Literatures of East and West” (editorial Comares), a collection of essays on Asian, European, and Hispanic literatures.

References

Albaladejo Mayordomo, Tomás (2008). “Poética, Literatura Comparada y análisis interdiscursivo”. Acta Poética, UNAM, 29. 2, pp. 245-275.

Albaladejo Mayordomo, Tomás (2011). “Sobre la literatura ectópica”. En Adrian Bieniec, Szilvia Lengl, Sandrine Okou y Natalia Shchyhlebska (eds.). Rem tene, verba sequentur. Gelebte Interkulturalität, 65, Dresde, pp. 141-153.

Albaladejo Mayordomo, Tomás (2012). “Literatura comparada y clases de discursos. El análisis interdiscursivo: textos literarios y forales de Castilla y de Portugal”. En Rafael Alemany Ferrer y Francisco Chico Rico (eds.). Literatures ibèriques medievals comparades/Literaturas ibéricas medievales comparadas. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, SELGYC [Sociedad Española de Literatura General y Comparada], pp. 15-38.

Apter, Emily (2006). The Translation Zone: a New Comparative Literature. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

Apter, Emily (2013). Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. Londres: Verso.

Auerbach, Erich (1969). “Philology and Weltliteratur”. Marie Said y Edward Said (trads.). The Centennial Review. Michigan University Press, 13. 1 (invierno), pp. 1-17.

Cao, Shunqing (2013). The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature. Nueva York-Londres: Springer.

Cao, Shunqing y Han, Zhoukun (2018). “Variation in translation and the formation of World Literature”. En Literatura Comparada en China. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 1616: Anuario de Literatura Comparada, 8, pp. 25-38.

Casanova, Pascale (2001). La República mundial de las Letras. Jaime Zulaika (trad.). Barcelona: Anagrama.

Damrosch, David (2003). What Is World Literature? Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

Damrosch, David (2008). “Toward a History of World Literature”. En New Literary History: Literary History in the Global Age. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 39. 3, (verano 2008), pp. 481-495.

Damrosch, David (2009). How to Read World Literature. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell.

Damrosch, David (2009). Teaching World Literature. Nueva York: Modern Language Association of America.

Damrosch, David (2011). “Comparative World Literature”. En Liviu Papadima, David Damrosch y Theo D'Haen (eds.). The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries. Ámsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 169-178.

Damrosch, David (2011). “World literature as alternative discourse”. Neohelicon, 38. 2 (diciembre), pp. 307-317.

Damrosch, David (2014). World Literature in Theory. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell.

Damrosch, David (2018). “Frames for World Literature”. En Weigui Fang (ed.). Tensions in World Literature: Between the Local and the Universal. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 93-112.

Damrosch, David (2020). Comparing the Literatures: Literary Studies in a Global Age. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

Damrosch, David (2022). Around the World in 80 Books: A Literary Journey. Londres: Pelican Books.

Domínguez, César (2012). “Literatura mundial en/desde el castellano”. Ínsula: revista de letras y ciencias humanas, 787-788 (julio), pp. 2-6.

Domínguez, César, Saussy, Haun y Villanueva, Darío (2016). Lo que Borges le enseñó a Cervantes: Una introducción a la literatura comparada. Madrid: Taurus.

Domínguez, César (2018). “Estudios de Este/Oeste, esquematismo y relativismo cultural algunas reservas a la poética comparada de Earl Miner”. 1616: Anuario de la Sociedad Española de Literatura General y Comparada, 8, pp. 277-320.

Ďurišin, Dionyz (2012). “World Literature as a Target Literary-Historical Category”. En Theo D’haen, César Domínguez y Mads Rosendahl Thomsen (eds.). World Literature: A Reader. Nueva York- Londres: Routledge, pp. 150-159.

Eckermann, Johann Peter (1990). Conversaciones con Goethe. Estudio introductorio de Francisco Ayala. México: Océano-Conaculta.

Etiemble, René (1977). Ensayos de literatura (verdaderamente) general. Roberto Yahni (trad.). Madrid: Taurus.

Even-Zohar, Itamar (1999). “La posición de la literatura traducida en el polisistema literario”. En Montserrat Iglesias (coord.). Teoría de los Polisistemas. Madrid: Arco/Libros, pp. 223-232.

Fang, Weigui (2018). “Introduction: What Is World Literature?”. En Tensions in World Literature: Between the Local and the Universal. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-64.

Ferré, Juan Francisco (2022). Yin y Yang. El poder de Eros en las literaturas de Oriente y Occidente. Granada: Comares.

Gnisci, Armando (1998). “La literatura comparada como disciplina de descolonización”. En María José Vega y Neus Carbonell (eds.). La literatura comparada: principios y métodos. Madrid: Gredos, pp. 188-194.

Guillén, Claudio (1985). Entre lo uno y lo diverso. Introducción a la literatura comparada. Barcelona: Crítica.

Guillén, Claudio (1998). Múltiples moradas. Ensayo de Literatura Comparada. Barcelona: Tusquets.

Han, Zhoukun y Cao, Shunqing (2018). “Variation in translation and the formation of World Literature”. En Literatura Comparada en China, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 1616: Anuario de Literatura Comparada, 8, pp. 25-38.

Jameson, Fredric (2008). “New Literary History after the End of the New”. New Literary History, 39. 3 (verano), pp. 375-387.

Jameson, Fredric (2019). Allegory and Ideology. Londres-Nueva York: Verso.

Kadir, Djelal (2011). Memos from the Besieged City: Lifelines for Cultural Sustainability. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.

Kadir, Djelal (2013). “World Literature: The Allophone, the Differential, and the Common”. Modern Language Quarterly 74 (2), pp. 293-306.

https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-2073034

Marino, Adrian (1988). Comparatisme et Théorie de la littérature. París: PUF.

Miner, Earl Roy (1990). Comparative Poetics. An Intercultural Essay on Theories of Literature. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

Miner, Earl Roy (1993). “Estudios comparados interculturales”. En Marc Angenot, Jean Bessière, Douwe Fokkema y Eva Kushner (eds.). Teoría literaria. Isabel Vericat Núñez (trad.). Madrid, México: Siglo XXI Editores, pp. 183-205.

Miyoshi, Masao, y Jameson, Fredric (1997). The Culture of Globalization. Durham (CN): Duke University Press.

Moretti, Franco (1999). Atlas of the European Novel, 1800-1900. Londres: Verso.

Moretti, Franco (2000). “Conjectures on World Literature”. New Left Review, 1 (enero-febrero), pp. 54-68.

Moretti, Franco (2003). “More Conjectures”. New Left Review 20 (marzo-abril), pp. 73-81.

Moretti, Franco (2007). The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

Moretti, Franco (2007). The Novel, Volume 2: Forms and Themes. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

Moretti, Franco (2013): Distant Reading. Londres, Verso.

Pavel, Thomas (2003). La pensée du roman. Paris: Gallimard.

Pujante, David (2017). Eros y Tánatos en la cultura occidental (un estudio de tematología comparatista). Barcelona: Calambur.

Said, Edward (2000). Out of Place: A Memoir. Londres: Vintage.

Saussy, Haun (2006). Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Saussy, Haun (2012). “The Story of the Stone and World Literature”. En Andrew Schonebaum y Tina Lu (eds.). Approaches to Teaching The Story of the Stone (Dream of the Red Chamber). Nueva York: Modern Language Association of America, pp. 475-478.

Scarpetta, Guy (1981). Éloge du cosmopolitisme. París: Grasset.

Steiner, George (1997). Pasión intacta. Menchu Gutiérrez y Encarna Castejón (trads.). Madrid: Siruela.

Thirlwell, Adam (2014). La novela múltiple. Aleix Montoto (trad.). Barcelona: Anagrama.

Villanueva, Darío (1994). “Literatura comparada y Teoría de la literatura”. En Darío Villanueva (coord.). Curso de teoría de la literatura. Madrid: Taurus, pp. 99-127.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

How to Cite

The multiple and the diverse. Prolegomena to a theory of world literature. (2026). Castilla. Estudios De Literatura, 17, 184-213. https://doi.org/10.24197/h62gg437