Planning controversies between public administrations. Case study: Madrid capital

Authors

  • Marta Lora-Tamayo Vallvé Administrative Law of the National University of Distance Learning (UNED) , Departamento de Derecho Administrativo de la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
  • Amaya Casado Echarren Tecnic Comision of Licenses on the Guvernmental Area of Urbanism and Housing for Madrid City Hall , Comisión Técnica de Licencias del Área de Gobierno de Urbanismo y Vivienda en el Ayuntamiento de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.17.2014.159-174

Keywords:

regional capitals, urban planning policies, General Land Use Plans, interadministrative conflicts, legal mechanisms of coordination of interests

Abstract

Conflicts of jurisdiction between public Administrations are especially evident in the framework of the planning processes which refer to capital and major cities. Regional and municipal planning actors show different scales of interest. The case of Madrid capital is one of the best examples of overlapping interests. Madrid as a region, Madrid as a municipal territory, Madrid as the capital of Spain. This article summarizes with some case studies the political tension that arises from the defence of these different goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Portada Ciudades 17, 2014 (Belgrado)

Downloads

Published

2017-11-08

Issue

No. 17 (2014): Proximity, a new urban value?

Section

Miscellaneous section

License

All contents published in Ciudades are under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  • Attribution: any use of the work authorized by the license will be required to acknowledge authorship.

Authors continue to own their work and may republish their articles by other means without having to seek permission, as long as they state that the work was originally published in Ciudades.

How to Cite

Planning controversies between public administrations. Case study: Madrid capital. (2017). Ciudades, 17, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.17.2014.159-174