The gap between plan and territory: conceptual revision and instrumental renewal

Authors

  • Luis Miguel Valenzuela Montes Laboratory of Environmental Planning (LABPLAM), University of Granada , Laboratorio de Planificación Ambiental (LABPLAM), Universidad de Granada
  • Julio Alberto Soria Lara Laboratory of Environmental Planning (LABPLAM), University of Granada , Laboratorio de Planificación Ambiental (LABPLAM), Universidad de Granada
  • Francisco Aguilera Benavente Laboratory of Environmental Planning (LABPLAM), University of Granada , Laboratorio de Planificación Ambiental (LABPLAM), Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.15.2012.65-88

Keywords:

spatial planning, planning methodology, evaluation, scenarios, tools

Abstract

Methodological, instrumental and global factors seem to be decisive for the growing inability of the Spatial Planning. Furthermore, the Spatial Planning focusing on different scales and sectors is less and less able to regulate, coordinate and orient spatial development. A certain number of factors can explain that: the speculative demand of urban space, the low-cost places, the competences among municipalities or the interaction of different scalar plans. Factors, all of them, related to higher distance between plan and territory. Accordingly, it could be asserted that there is an unexpected territory as a context where the multi-sectorial, multi-scalar, multi-temporal or multi-instrumental dimensions are difficult to achieve. Through a critical revision of the factors and dimensions previously mentioned, this paper presents a conceptual renewal of the Spatial Planning based on three elements: a proactive use of the spatial information, the evaluation of planning and the use of scenarios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-29

How to Cite

The gap between plan and territory: conceptual revision and instrumental renewal. (2017). Ciudades, 15, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.15.2012.65-88