This is an outdated version published on 2024-12-27. Read the most recent version.

Statements, declared practices and beliefs about INVALSI assessment at primary school level: an exploratory study

Authors

  • Valentina Vaccaro INVALSI (Italy) and University of Oviedo (Spain) , INVALSI (Italia) y Universidad de Oviedo
  • Giorgio Bolondi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (Italy) , Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (Italia)
  • Luis José Rodríguez Muñiz University of Oviedo image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.2.2024.47-59

Keywords:

Perceived difficulty, Math education, MTSK model

Abstract

In this paper we retrace the main stages of an interdisciplinary research project with the aim of highlighting the views of mathematics teachers on large-scale standardized tests. The researchers analyse the responses of over 500 Italian primary school teachers to a questionnaire prepared for this purpose using correlational and principal component analysis (PCA). The comparison between the questions relating to the statements and those relating to classroom practices allowed us to let the attitudes and beliefs emerge. Teachers’ recognition of the validity of the INVALSI data in building classrooms practices clashes with the belief that large scale standardized assessments are used by Institutions for the evaluation of the single teacher.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the Classroom: Teachers’ Opinions of Statewide Testing Programs. Theory into Practice, 42, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4

Arzarello, F., & Ferretti, F. (2021). The connection between the mathematics INVALSI test and the teaching practices: an explorative study. In P. Falzetti (Ed.), INVALSI data to investigate the characteristics of student, schools and society: IV Seminar “INVALSI data: a tool for teaching and scientific research” (pp. 96-109). FrancoAngeli.

Bolondi, G. (2015) Transformar la evaluación estandarizada en evaluación formativa. In B. D’Amore & M. I. Fandiño Pinilla (Eds.), Didáctica de la Matemática. Una mirada internacional empírica y teórica (pp. 109-120). Universidad de La Sabana.

Bolondi, G., & Ferretti, F. (2021) Quantifying Solid Findings in Mathematics Education: Loss of Meaning for Algebraic Symbols. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 29(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.29.01.001

Ciani, A., & Vannini, I. (2017) Equità e didattica. Validazione di scale sulle convinzioni di insegnamento democratico. Cadmo, 25(2), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.3280/CAD2017-002003

De Lange, J. (2007). Large-Scale Assessment and Mathematics Education. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1111-1142). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).

Di Martino, P., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2017). Beyond performance results: Analyzing the informational and developmental potentials of standardized mathematics tests. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37, 39-44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26548470

Duval R. (1993). Registres de représentations sémiotiques et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensée. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 5, 37-65.

Faggiano, E., Monaco, A., Rizzo, O. G., & Vaccaro, V. (2023). An exploratory study on the connection between INVALSI assessment and mathematics teaching and learning processes at the Primary School level. In P. Falzetti (Ed.), The School and Its Protagonists: The Teachers. V Seminar “INVALSI data: a tool for teaching and scientific research” (pp. 9-23). FrancoAngeli.

Gagatsis, A., Michael-Chrysanthou, P., Christodoulou, T., Iliada, E., Bolondi, G., Vannini, I., Ferretti, F., & Sbaragli, S. (2019). Formative assessment in the teaching and learning of mathematics: Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about mathematical error. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 56(2), 145-180.

Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202

Looney, J. W. (2011). Integrating Formative and Summative Assessment: Progress Toward a Seamless System? OECD Education Working Papers, No. 58. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en.

Meinck, S., Neuschmidt, O., & Taneva, M. (2017). Workshop Theme: “Use of Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data for Research on Mathematics Didactics”. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME-13 Monographs (pp. 741-742). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_132

Rizzo, O. G., & Vaccaro, V. (in press). Attitudes and beliefs of primary school mathematics teachers: an exploratory study on the use of INVALSI assessment data in a competency-based approach. In P. Falzetti (Ed.), I dati INVALSI: uno strumento per la ricerca. FrancoAngeli.

Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., Díaz, P., Mier. V., & Alonso, P. (2016) Washback Effect of University Entrance exams in Applied Mathematics to Social Sciences. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0167544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167544

Scheerens, J. (2016). Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness. A Critical Review of the Knowledge Base. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7459-8

Spagnolo, C., Giglio, R., Tiralongo, S., & Bolondi, G. (2022). Formative Assessment in LDL Workshop Activities: Engaging Teachers in a Training Program. In B. Csapó & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Computer Supported Education, 13th International Conference, CSEDU 2021 (pp. 560–576). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14756-2_27

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

Versions

How to Cite

Statements, declared practices and beliefs about INVALSI assessment at primary school level: an exploratory study. (2024). Edma 0-6: Educación Matemática En La Infancia, 13(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.2.2024.47-59