Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria

Authors

  • Antonio Alberte González , Universidad de Málaga (España)

Abstract

The writer of this article purports to prove that Mesala's participation in the Dialogus de oratoribus is not only a cristicism of the school of rhetoric upheld by Quintilian but it is also a correction of Quintilian's distorted version of Cicero's opinion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-19

Issue

No. 7 (1993)

Section

Artículos

License

The articles published at Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica will have a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica.

How to Cite

Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria. (2019). Minerva, 7, 255-267. https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3164