From Herodotus to the bell of Huesca. Considerations and new proposal about its classic tradition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/mrfc.30.2017.153-186Keywords:
tradition, enigmatic counsel, false mutilated deserter, strategy books, FrontinusAbstract
This article has a double purpose. On the one hand, it aims to deepen into the tradition of the classic precedents of the legend of the bell of Huesca by comparing three traditions about the topic: Greek, Roman and medieval, all of them between the 5th century b.C. until the 14th century AD. (the Crónica Pinatense will be the terminus ad quem in the medieval tradition), and the evidences existing about them. Four points in these traditions have been compared: the request of advice, the circumstances in which the advice is given, the explanations that the messenger offers to the claimant of the advice and, finally, the interpretation of the advice. On the other hand, the paper aims to offer a new source for the medieval tradition. This new source is related to chivalry guidebooks, in the tradition of the stratagy books.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The articles published at Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica will have a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica.
