Freedom of expression vs right to reputation, when the affected party is a member of the Judiciary (analysis to the ECHR judgment in the case of Benítez Moriana and Íñigo Fernández v. Spain (March 9, 2021))

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/ree.80.2022.291-305

Keywords:

Freedom of expression, right to reputation, European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Article 19 (2021), State of SLAPPs in Spain. Country Report, [chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/A19_MFRR-Spain-Report_Final_29Nov21.pdf]

De Pablo Serrano, Alejandro (2018), Honor, injurias y calumnias: los delitos contra el honor en el derecho histórico y en el derecho vigente español, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch.

Grupo de Estudios de Política Criminal (2019), Una propuesta alternativa de regulación de los delitos de expresión, Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch.

Additional Files

Published

2022-06-29

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL DECISIONS ON HUMAN RIGHTS TO WHICH SPAIN IS A PARTY

How to Cite

Freedom of expression vs right to reputation, when the affected party is a member of the Judiciary (analysis to the ECHR judgment in the case of Benítez Moriana and Íñigo Fernández v. Spain (March 9, 2021)). (2022). Revista De Estudios Europeos, 80, 291-305. https://doi.org/10.24197/ree.80.2022.291-305