Gigas for Schools: un proyecto para acercar la tecnología y el emprendimiento al alumnado femenino

  • Lucía Rodríguez-Olay Universidad de Oviedo
Keywords: education; business; stereotype; pedagogical innovation; technology.

Abstract

Gigas for Schools promotes the design and development of social or business entrepreneurship projects with a technological base. This year, these projects were carried out by students in the 4th year of Secondary School, 1st year of Baccalaureate, Basic Vocational Training and Intermediate Vocational Training at 13 state-subsidised schools. In addition to the general objective of promoting entrepreneurship and technology, there is also the specific objective of encouraging female students' interest in these fields. The results of the surveys carried out ad hoc point to an improvement in the assessment of female students with regard to entrepreneurship, but not so much with regard to technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bae, T., et al. (2014) .The Relationship between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta- Analytic Review Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095

Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you
don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine
12 Psychology of Women Quarterly XX(X)
appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75,
95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1

Bian, L., Leslie, S., Murphy, M. C., & Cimpian, A. (2018). Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jesp.2017.11.006

Cheryan, S., Drury, B. J., & Vichayapai, M. (2013). Enduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s
academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37,
72–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312459328

Comisión Europea (2007). Competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente un marco de referencia europeo. Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas.
Comisión Europea (2012). Entrepreneurship in the EU and Beyond. Report. Flash. Eurobarometer, nº 354.

Comisión Europea (2013). Plan de Acción sobre Emprendimiento 2020. Relanzar el espíritu emprendedor en Europa. Comisión Europea. Disponible en: https://www.prodetur.es/prodetur/AlfrescoFileTransferServlet?action=download&ref=127487b5-c7b4-4f4d-9497-439206192b8e

Cvencek, D., Kapur, M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Math achievement, stereotypes, and math self-concepts among elementaryschool students in Singapore. Learning and Instruction, 39,1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.04.002

Dweck, C. S. (2007). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk.
In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women
in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55,
Chap. 3).APA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-004

Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. T. (2016). What motivates females and
males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 100–106. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.1177/0165025415616201

EURYDICE. (2002). Competencias clave. Un concepto en expansión dentro de la educación general obligatoria. Disponible en: http://www.educacion.gob.es/cide/espanol/eurydice/publicaciones/eury2002comc/eury 2002comc-ES.pdf

García, S. & Padilla, M. T. (2009). Los intereses académicos y profesionales de chicas que finalizan la escolaridad obligatoria. Revista de Educación, mayo-agosto, 311-344.

George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Gilbert, P. N., O’Brien, L. T., Garcia, D. M., & Marx, D. M. (2015).
Not the sum of its parts: Decomposing implicit academic stereotypes to understand sense of fit in math and English. Sex Roles,
72, 25–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0428-y

Gliem, J.A & Gliem, R.R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Columbus. The Ohio State University. Disponible en: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/Gliem%20%26%20Gliem.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt
out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659

González, B. (1999). Los estereotipos como factor de socialización en el género. Comunicar, 12, 79-88

González-Palencia, R. & Jiménez, C. (2016). La brecha de género en la educación tecnológica. Ensaio: aval. pol. públ. Educ., Rio de Janeiro, 24(92), 743-771

González, C., & Pazmiño, M. (2015). Cálculo e interpretación del Alfa de Cronbach para el caso de validación de la consistencia interna de un cuestionario, con dos posibles escalas tipo Likert. Revista
publicando, 2(1), 62-67.

Joensuu-Salo, S., Varamäki, E., & Viljamaa, A. (2015). Beyond intentions–what makes a student start a firm?. Education+ Training, 57(8/9), 853-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2014-0142

Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 374, 262–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1261375

Lima, E., Lopes, R. M., Nassif, V., y Silva, D. (2015). Opportunities to improve entrepreneurship education: Contributions considering brazilian challenges. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1033-1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12110

Matas, A. (2018). Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347

Megías, I, & Ballesteros, J. C. (2014). Jóvenes y género: el estado de la cuestión. monográfico, Centro Reina Sofía sobre adolescencia y juventud.

Muñoz, A & Guerreiro, B (2001). Materiales previos y conclusiones del Grupo de Trabajo. Sexo y género en la educación. CONGRESO 2001 “Construir la Escuela Desde la Diversidad y para la Igualdad”. Disponible en: https://www.nodo50.org/igualdadydiversidad/g_sexo.htm

Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Liñán, F., Akhtar, I., & Neame, C. (2018). Does entrepreneurship education in the first year of higher education develop entrepreneurial intentions? The role of learning and inspiration. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 452-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1177716

Nadler, J., et al. (2015). Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 71-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.994590.

Oliver, A.; Galiana, L.; Gutiérrez-Benet, M. (2016). Diagnóstico y políticas de promoción del emprendimiento en estudiantes. Anales de Psicología, 32(1), 183-189. DOI: http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.186681

Sánchez, J.C., Ward, A., Hernández, B., & Florez, J. (2017). Educación
emprendedora: Estado del arte. Propósitos y Representaciones, 401-473

Sánchez, I. y Pérez, M. (2019) El impacto de la educación en la intención emprendedora de los estudiantes del grado de Economía. Revista de Estudios Empresariales, 1, 22 – 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17561/ree.v

Starr, C. (2018). “I’m Not a Science Nerd!”: STEM
Stereotypes, Identity, and Motivation
Among Undergraduate Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, XX(X)
1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318793848

Seifert, T., Hervás Gómez, C., & Toledo Morales, P. (2019). Diseño y
validación del cuestionario sobre percepciones y actitudes hacia el
aprendizaje por dispositivos móviles. Pixel-Bit. Revista de medios y
Educación, 45-64

Shahverdi, M., Ismail, K., y Qureshi, M. (2018). The effect of perceived barriers on social entrepreneurship intention in Malaysian universities: The moderating role of
education. Management Science Letters, 8(5), 341-352.

Smith, J. L., Brown, E. R., Thoman, D. B., & Deemer, E. D. (2015).
Losing its expected communal value: How stereotype threat
undermines women’s identity as research scientists. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 443–466. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9296-8

Smyth, F. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios,
implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology,
6, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with
group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity
threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social
psychology, 34 (pp.379–440).Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0

Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender
stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and
women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
International journal of medical education, 53-55.

UNESCO. (2018). Resumen sobre el género del informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo: Cumplir nuestros compromisos de igualdad de género en la educación. UNESCO. Disponible en: http://gem-report2017.unesco.org/en/home/

Valencia, A., Restrepo, I. A. M., y Restrepo, J. M. V. (2014). Aportes teóricos y empíricos al estudio del emprendedor. Cuadernos de Administración, 30(51), 89-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/cdea.v30i51.46

Weisgram, E. S., & Diekman, A. B. (2017). Making STEM “family
friendly”: The impact of perceiving science careers as familycompatible. Social Sciences, 6, 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020061
Published
11/11/2021