Look through your windows

virtual ethnography and co-production in a meteorology class in Chile

Authors

Keywords:

etnografía virtual; co-producción; espacios multimodales; estudios de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad; Chile

Abstract

Interest in the ethnographic study of virtual spaces has grown in recent years. Today, a wide variety of social phenomena occur in multimodal spaces, that is, distributed through both physical and virtual environments. Online and offline spaces are part of one everyday experience. However, how are both dimensions integrated in a coherent arrangement? In this article, I argue that online and offline spaces co-produce an integrated way of dwelling in the world. I show this by describing on online meteorology class, where students and a teacher connect representations of the atmosphere with the local weather of local spaces. In the conclusion, I discuss how co-production and virtual ethnography can be complementary perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre, G., Undurraga, T., Cotoras, D. & Orellana, T. (2022). El estudio científico del cambio climático en Chile: espacio local y fenómeno global. Antropologías del Sur, 9(17), 199-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25074/rantros.v9i17.2147.

Airoldi, M. (2018) Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 661-673, DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622.

Boellstorff,T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C. & Taylor, T. (2012). Three Brief Histories. En Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method (pp. 13-28). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Caliandro A. (2018). Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,47(5), 551-578. DOI:10.1177/0891241617702960.

Dowling, D. (1999). Experimenting on Theories. Science in Context, 12(2), 261-273. DOI: 10.1017/S0269889700003410.

Edwards, P. (2010). Introduction. En A Vast Machine Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (pp. xiii-xvii). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Garcia, A., Standlee, A., Bechkoff, J. & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839.

Garreaud, R. et al. (2015). La Mega-Sequia 2010–2015: Una Lección Para el Futuro. Center for Climate and Resilience Research-CR2: Santiago, Chile.

Góralska, M. (2020). Anthropology from Home Advice on Digital Ethnography for the Pandemic Times. Anthropology in Action, 27(1), 46–52. DOI:10.3167/aia.2020.270105.

Hallett, R. & K. Barber (2014). Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306-330. DOI: 10.1177/0891241613497749.

Hine, C. (2000). Etnografía Virtual. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.

Hine, C. (2009). Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(6), 652-671. DOI:10.1177/016224390303598.

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet. Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London, New Delhi, New York & Sydney: Bloomsbury.

Horst, H. (2012). New Media Technology in Every Day Life. En Digital Anthropology (pp. 61-79). London & New York: Berg.

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of Enviroment. London: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representations to the education of attention. En The Debated Mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113-153). London & New York: Berg.

Ingold, T. (2007a). Earth, sky, wind, and weather. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, S19-S38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00401.x.

Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. En States of Knowledge The co-production of science and social order (pp. 1-12). London and New York: Routledge.

Jensen, C. B. (2004). Researching partially existing objects: What is an electronic patient record? Where do you find it? How do you study it? Centre for STS Studies, Aarhus, Working paper 4. Available from http://imv.au.dk/sts/arbejdspapirer/WP4.pdf (accessed October 1, 2005).

Latour, B. (2004). How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2-3), 205-299. DOI: 10.1177/1357034X04042943.

Latour, B. (2005). Reensamblar lo social. Una introducción a la teoría del actor red. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1995). La vida en el laboratorio. La construcción de los hechos científicos. Madrid: Alianza editorial.

Lemos, M. & Morehouse, B. (2005). The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 57-68. DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004.

Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of MultiSited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117. DOI:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.

Marres, N. (2017). Digital Sociology. The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge, Oxford, Boston & New York: Polity Press.

Miller, C. & Wyborn, C. (2020). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 113, 88-95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016.

Miller, D. & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet. An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford & New York: Berg.

Miller, D. & Horst, H. (2012). The Digital and the Human: A Prospectus for Digital Anthropology. En Digital Anthropology (pp.3-35). London & New York: Berg.

Peirano, M., Martínez-Moreno, M. & Mayorga, E. (2021). Etnografía no es método. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, 44, 29-43. DOI:10.7440/antipoda44.2021.aop.01

Pink, S. (2016). Experience. En Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research (pp. 161-165). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. & Tacchi, J. (2016). Ethnography in a Digital World. En Digital Ethnography. Principles and Practice (pp. 1-17). Los Ángeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE.

Postill, J. & Pink, S. (2012). Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123-134. DOI:10.1177/1329878X1214500114.

Robinson, L. & Shulz, J. (2009). New Avenues for Sociological Inquiry: Evolving Forms of Ethnographic Practice. Sociology, 43(4), 685-698. DOI:10.1177/0038038509105415.

Roger, R. (2013). Digital Methods. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: The MIT Press.

Simonetti, C. (2019). Weathering climate: Telescoping change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 25(2), 241-264. DOI:10.1111/1467-9655.13024

Star, S. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377-391. DOI:10.1177/00027649921955326

Sumiala, J. & Tikka, M. (2020). Digital Ethnographers On The Move – An Unexpected Proposal. Journal Of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 39-55. DOI:10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.37.

Downloads

Published

11/09/2022

How to Cite

Aguirre, G. (2022). Look through your windows: virtual ethnography and co-production in a meteorology class in Chile. Sociología Y Tecnociencia, 12(2), 124–143. Retrieved from https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/6322