The second-person in ‘El río del Edén’: the comeback of the original curse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/hrzebg10

Keywords:

José María Merino, Second-person, Narratology, El río del Edén

Abstract

This study analyzes the use of the second-person in El río del edén (2012) by José María Merino, a work in which the original functions of this narrative technique are reinstated after its abuse in experimental periods. Through a homodiegetic narration, Merino employs the second-person to create an external view of the inner reality of his protagonist, as well as to develop an unrelenting judgment of Daniel against himself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso, Santos (2003), La novela española en el fin de siglo, 1975-2001, Madrid, Mare Nostrum Comunicación.

Bal, Mieke (2017), Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

Barthes, Roland (2016), Análisis estructural del relato, México D.F., Ediciones Coyoacán.

Genette, G. (1989), Figuras III, Barcelona, Lumen.

Goytisolo, Juan (1999), Reivindicación del conde don Julián, Madrid, Alianza.

Martín Gaite, Carmen (2003), Retahílas, Barcelona, Crítica.

Merino, José María (2012), El río del Edén, Madrid, Alfaguara.

Redacción (2012), “José María Merino firma una historia de amor y deslealtades”, El Día de Córdoba (noviembre 13), en https://www.eldiadecordoba.es/ocio/Jose-Maria-Merino-historia-deslealtades_0_642835979.html (fecha de consulta: 05/04/2025).

Schmid, Wolf (2010), Narratology: An introduction, Berlín, de Gruyter.

Yerro Villanueva, Tomás (1977), Aspectos técnicos y estructurales de la novela española actual, Pamplona, Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.

Ynduráin, Francisco (1971), “La novela desde la segunda persona”, en D. Domenech (ed.), Historia y estructura de la obra literaria, Madrid, Madrid S.A, pp. 161, 173.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

How to Cite

The second-person in ‘El río del Edén’: the comeback of the original curse. (2025). XXI Century. Spanish Literature and Culture, 23, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.24197/hrzebg10