From the "Dominion Paradigm" to the "Community of Creation":
the Concept of Deep Incarnation as a Key to Articulate the Relationship of Christians with Nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/jstr.1.2024.94-116Keywords:
Deep Incarnation; ecology; ecological theology; animals, animalism; creation.Abstract
The theological concept of Deep Incarnation (not very widespread in our environment, and enunciated in 2001 by the Danish Lutheran theologian Niels Henrik Gregersen) can help Christians (and human beings in general) to articulate their relationship with the natural world. All this within the framework of a pressing ecological crisis that has raised great alarms and awakened the sensitivity of many Christians in relation to nature, with the publication of Laudato Sí' by Francis, in 2015 as a fundamental milestone.
Gregersen sais that when the Son incarnates in Jesus of Nazareth as a human being, there is a deeper plane in which we have to see that incarnation: in the biological and material framework of the natural world, in which the human being is a non-isolated species from the rest, but fully related to all of Creation both within the framework of evolution and in that of the interactions between species that make life possible. And this Deep Incarnation has implications for the fullness and transfiguration of all Creation in Christ (not only of humanity), and of the relationship of the human being with the rest of its members.
Downloads
References
Gregersen, N. H. 2001. “The Cross of Christ in an Evolutionary World”, Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 40: 205.
Gregersen, N. H. 2010. “Deep Incarnation: Why Evolutionary Continuity Matters in Christology”, Toronto Journal of Theology, 26(2): 173.
Gregersen, N. H. 2013. “Deep Incarnation and Kenosis: In, With, Under, and As: A Response to Ted Peters”, Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 52: 251.
Gregersen, N. H. (ed.). 2015. Incarnation. On the Scope and Depth of Christology, Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Gregersen, N. H. 2016. “The Emotional Christ: Bonaventure and Deep Incarnation”, Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 55: 247.
Gregersen, N. H. 2016. “Deep incarnation: From deep history to post-axial religion”, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72(4), a3428. DOI (http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3428).
Clough, D. L. 2012. On Animals. Volume I: Systematic Theology, Londres: Bloomsbury.
Clough, D. L. 2018. On Animals. Volume II: Theological Ethics, Londres: Bloomsbury.
Clough, D. L. 2022. “The meaning of Dominion”, The Ark. The magazine of Catholic Concern for Animals, 251.
Deane-Drummond, C. E.; Clough, D. L. (eds). 2009. Creaturely Theology. God, Humans and Other Animals, Londres: SCM Press.
Johnson, E. A. 2015. «Pregunta a las bestias». Darwin y el Dios del amor, Santander: Sal Terrae.
Johnson, E. A. “Jesus and the Cosmos: Soundings in Deep Christology”, en Niels H. Gregersen (ed.), Incarnation: 133-156.
Edwards, D. 2014. Partaking of God. Trinity, Evolution, and Ecology, Minnesota: Michael Glazier Books, Liturgical Press.
Edwards, D. 2017. The Natural World and God: Theological Explorations, Adelaida: ATF Press.
Edwards, D. 2019. Deep Incarnation, God’s redemptive suffering with creatures, Nueva York: Orbis Books.
Santmire, H. P. 1985. The Travail of Nature. The Ambiguous Ecological Promise of Christian Theology, Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Nash, J. A. 1991. Loving Nature. Ecological Integrity and Christian Responsibility, Washington: Churches' Center for Theology and Public Policy.
Francisco. 2015. Laudato Si’. Carta Encíclica del Santo Padre Francisco sobre el cuidado de la Casa Común, Vaticano. Editorial EDIBESA.
Conferencia Episcopal Española. 2011. Sagrada Biblia. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.
Declaración de Cambridge sobre la conciencia. Accesible en español a través de la web: http://www.animal-ethics.org/declaracion-consciencia-cambridge/. Consulta 7 de marzo de 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andoni Aguirre González, Roberto Casas Andrés

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published at Journal of the Sociology and Theory of Religion will have a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Journal of the Sociology and Theory of Religion.
