Lexical Knowledge and Amount of L2 Exposure: A Study on CLIL Primary-school Learners’ Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge





instructed amount of L2 exposure, receptive lexical knowledge, CLIL, primary education


L2 lexical knowledge has been an issue that has attracted much attention among SLA scholars, with studies examining the impact of different language teaching approaches on vocabulary knowledge. However, little research has been conducted to determine the amount of exposure needed for significant lexical improvement. This paper explores the impact of varying instructed amount of exposure on 112 CLIL primary-school learners’ receptive knowledge of high-frequency vocabulary. Participants were asked to respond to the 1K and 2K of the Updated Vocabulary Levels Tests (Webb et al.). Data were examined looking into differences related to the amount of L2 exposure. Findings suggest a possible effect of instructed amount of exposure on the recognition of high-frequency words, which is discussed concerning its possible implications for the CLIL instructional practice.


Download data is not yet available.


Adolphs, Svenja, and Norbert Schmitt. “Lexical Coverage of Spoken Discourse.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 24, no. 4, 2003, pp. 425–38, doi:10.1093/applin/24.4.425.

Agustín-Llach, María del Pilar. “Exploring the Receptive Vocabulary of Young CLIL and Non-CLIL Learners.” EuroSLA Conference, 2012, Poznan, Poland. Conference Presentation.

Agustín-Llach, María del Pilar. “The Role of Spanish L1 in the Vocabulary Use of CLIL and Non-CLIL EFL Learners.” Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by María del Pilar Agustín-Llach and Rosa María Jiménez Catalán, Multilingual Matters, 2009, pp. 112–30.

Agustín-Llach, María del Pilar, and Andrés Canga Alonso. “Vocabulary Growth in Young CLIL and Traditional EFL Learners: Evidence from Research and Implications for Education.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 26, no. 2, 2016, pp. 211–27, doi:10.1111/ijal.12090.

Agustín-Llach, María Pilar, and Rosa María Jiménez Catalán. “Teasing out the Role of Age and Exposure in EFL Learners’ Lexical Profiles: A Comparison of Children and Adults.” IRAL—International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, vol. 56, no. 1, 2018, pp. 36–43, doi:10.1515/iral-2015-0075.

Alejo, Rafael, and Ana María Piquer-Píriz. “Measuring the Productive Vocabulary of Secondary School CLIL Students: Is Lex30 a Valid Test for Low Level School Learners?” Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, no. 13, 2016, pp. 31–53.

Arribas, Mario. “Analysing a Whole CLIL School: Students’ Attitudes, Motivation, and Receptive Vocabulary Outcomes.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, 2016, pp. 267–92, doi:10.5294/la-clil.2016.9.2.2.

Ball, Phil, et al. Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford UP, 2015.

Canga Alonso, Andrés. “Receptive Vocabulary of CLIL and Non-CLIL Primary and Secondary School Learners.” Complutense Journal of English Studies, vol. 23, 2015, pp. 59–77, doi:10.5209/rev_CJES.2015.v23.51301.

Canga Alonso, Andrés. “The Receptive Vocabulary of 6th-Grade Primary-School Students in CLIL Instruction: A Preliminary Study.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, vol. 6, no. 2, 2013, pp. 22–41, doi:10.5294/3138.

Canga Alonso, Andrés. “The Receptive Vocabulary Size of Spanish 5th Grade Primary School Students in CLIL and Non-CLIL Instruction.” ES: Revista de Filología Inglesa, vol. 36, 2015, pp. 63–85.

Canga Alonso, Andrés, and Mario Arribas García. “The Benefits of CLIL Instruction in Spanish Students’ Productive Vocabulary Knowledge.” Encuentro Journal, vol. 24, 2014, pp. 15–31.

Castellano-Risco, Irene. “Receptive Vocabulary and Learning Strategies in Secondary School CLIL and Non-CLIL Learners.” Onomazein, vol. 40, 2018, pp. 28‒48, doi:10.7764/onomazein.40.02

Castellano-Risco, Irene. Estrategias de aprendizaje y conocimiento léxico: un estudio sobre el alumnado de educación secundaria en programas de Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lengua Extranjera. 2021. Universidad de Extremadura, PhD dissertation.

Castellano-Risco, Irene, et al. “The Development of Receptive Vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the Learning Context the Main Variable?” System, vol. 91, 2020, 102263. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102263.

Coyle, Do, et al. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge UP, 2010.

Dang, Thi Ngoc Yen, and Stuart Webb. “The Lexical Profile of Academic Spoken English.” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 33, no. Supplement C, Jan. 2014, pp. 66–76, doi:10.1016/j.esp.2013.08.001.

Fernández Fontecha, Almudena. “Motivation and Vocabulary Breadth in CLIL and EFL Contexts. Different Age, Same Time of Exposure.” Complutense Journal of English Studies, vol. 23, 2015, pp. 79–95, doi:10.5209/rev_EIUC.2012.v20.39993.

García Mayo, María del Pilar, and María Luisa García Lecumberri, editors. Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Multilingual Matters, 2003.

Jiménez Catalán, Rosa María, and Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe. “The Receptive Vocabulary of EFL Learners in Two Instructional Contexts: CLIL versus Non-CLIL Learners.” Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Ruiz de Zarobe and Jiménez Catalán, Multilingual Matters, 2009, pp. 81–93.

Hernández Muñoz, Natividad, et al. “Cognitive Factors of Lexical Availability in a Second Language.” Lexical Availability in English and Spanish as a Second Language, edited by Rosa María Jiménez Catalán, Springer, 2014, pp. 169–86, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1_10.

Howard, Martin. “Input Perspectives on the Role of Learning Context in Second Language Acquisition. An Introduction to the Special Issue.” IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 49, 2011, pp. 71–82, doi:10.1515/iral.2011.004.

Lasagabaster, David, and Aintzane Doiz. “A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 38, no. 5, Oct. 2017, pp. 688–712, doi:10.1093/applin/amv059.

Lasagabaster, David, and Raquel López Beloqui. “The Impact of Type of Approach (CLIL Versus EFL) and Methodology (Book-Based Versus Project Work) on Motivation.” Porta Linguarum, vol. 23, 2015, pp. 41–57.

Lorenzo, Francisco, and Leticia Rodríguez. “Onset and Expansion of L2 Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency in Bilingual Settings: CALP in CLIL.” System, vol. 47, 2014, pp. 64–73, doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.016.

Manzano Vázquez, Borja. “CLIL in Three Spanish Monolingual Communities: The Examples of Extremadura, Madrid and La Rioja.” Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, vol. 15, 2015, pp. 135–59.

Mehisto, Peeter, et al. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan Education, 2008.

Miralpeix, Immaculada. “Lexical Knowledge in Instructed Language Learning: The Effects of Age and Exposure.” International Journal of English Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2007, pp. 61–83.

Moreno-Espinosa, Soraya. “Can P_Lex Accurately Measure Lexical Richness in the Written Production of Young Learners of EFL?” Porta Linguarum, vol. 4, 2005, pp. 7–21.

Muñoz, Carmen. Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning. Multilingual Matters, 2006.

Muñoz, Carmen. “Contrasting Effects of Starting Age and Input on the Oral Performance of Foreign Language Learners.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 35, 2014, pp. 463–82, doi:10.1093/applin/amu024.

Nation, Paul. The BNC/COCA Word Family Lists. 2012.

Nation, Paul. “How Large a Vocabulary Is Needed for Reading and Listening?” The Canadian Modern Language Review, vol. 63, 2006, pp. 59–82.

Nation, Paul. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Newbury, 1990.

Nation, Paul. “Testing and Teaching Vocabulary.” Guidelines, vol. 5, no. 1, 1983, pp. 12–25.

Rothman, Jason, and Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes. “Input Quality Matters: Some Comments on Input Type and Age-Effects in Adult SLA.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 31, no. 2, 2010, pp. 301–06, doi:10.1093/applin/amq004.

Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda. “CLIL and Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study in the Basque Country.” International CLIL Research Journal, vol. 1, 2008, pp. 60–73.

Schmitt, Norbert. Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. Palgrave Press, 2010.

Schmitt, Norbert, et al. “Developing and Exploring the Behaviour of Two New Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Tests.” Language Testing, vol. 18, no. 1, 2001, pp. 55–88, doi:10.1177/026553220101800103.

Schmitt, Norbert, and Diane Schmitt. “A Reassessment of Frequency and Vocabulary Size in L2 Vocabulary Teaching.” Language Teaching, vol. 47, no. 4, Oct. 2014, pp. 484–503, doi:10.1017/S0261444812000018.

Sylvén, Liss. Investigating Content and Language Integrated Learning: Insights from Swedish High Schools. Multilingual Matters, 2019.

Tragant, Elsa, et al. “Vocabulary Learning at Primary School: A Comparison of EFL and CLIL.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 19, no. 5, 2015, pp. 579–91.

Webb, Stuart, et al. “The Updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and Validating Two New Forms of the VLT.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 168, no. 1, 2017, pp. 33–69, doi:10.1075/itl.168.1.02web.

Webb, Stuart, and Paul Nation. How Vocabulary Is Learned. Oxford UP, 2017.

Webb, Stuart, and Michael P. H. Rodgers. “The Lexical Coverage of Movies.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 30, no. 3, 2009, pp. 407–27.

Webb, Stuart, and Michael P. H. Rodgers. “The Vocabulary Demands of Television Programmes.” Language Learning, vol. 59, no. 2, 2009, pp. 335–66.




How to Cite

Castellano-Risco, I. “Lexical Knowledge and Amount of L2 Exposure: A Study on CLIL Primary-School Learners’ Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge”. ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies, no. 43, Nov. 2022, pp. 133-56, doi:10.24197/ersjes.43.2022.133-156.