The Woman in White: Marian Halcombe, or Checkmate on Women’s Empowerment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.43.2022.157-181Keywords:
women's empowerment, feminism, Victorian patriarchal discourse, Wilkie Collins, The Woman in WhiteAbstract
Wilkie Collins’s fraudulent rhetoric of protest against patriarchal Victorian oppression is manifested through his manipulation of Marian Halcombe’s character: she does not represent an attainable example of women’s empowerment but rather of women’s subordination. Marian confronts Victorian patriarchal discourse through the doomed, symbolic games of chess she plays with Fosco and Collins, but she is inevitably disciplined, tamed, and transformed into the perfect “Angel in the House.” When the novel concludes, neither gender roles will have been changed nor equality attained, and feminine readers will have been lured into accepting that resignation, sacrifice and submission are the only alternatives.
Downloads
References
Altick, Richard Daniel. Victorian People and Ideas: A Companion for the Modern Reader of Victorian Literature. 1st ed., Norton, 1973.
Ashley, Robert P. “Wilkie Collins Reconsidered.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction, vol. 4, no. 4, 1950, pp. 265–73, doi:10.2307/3044407.
Auerbach, Nina. Woman and the Demon: The Life of a Victorian Myth. Harvard UP, 1982.
Bachman, Savannah J. “Shutting Her Up”: An Exploration of the Madwoman and the Madhouse in Victorian Literature. 2017. Bard College, Senior undergraduate project. Senior Projects Spring.
Branfield, Shannon, “Sufficient for Herself”: Women & Silence in Wilkie Collins’s Novels. 2016. Utah State University, Master of Arts Report. All Graduate Plan B and other Reports.
Collins, Richard. “Marian’s Moustache Bearded Ladies, Hermaphrodites, and Intersexual Collage in The Woman in White.” Reality's Dark Light: The Sensational Wilkie Collins, edited by Maria K. Bachman and Don Richard Cox, U of Tennessee P, 2003, pp. 131‒72.
Collins, Wilkie. The Woman in White. Penguin Popular Classics, 1994.
Colvin, Trey V. Jezebel’s Daughters: A Study of Wilkie Collins and his Female Villains. 2000. University of North Texas, Doctoral dissertation.
Dau, Duc, and Shale Preston, editors. Queer Victorian Families: Curious Relations in Literature. Routledge, 2015, doi:10.4324/9781315762067.
Dever, Carolyn. “The Marriage Plot and Its Alternatives.” The Cambridge Companion to Wilkie Collins, edited by Jenny Bourne Taylor, Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 112–24.
Fauvel, Aude. “Crazy Brains and the Weaker Sex: The British Case (1860–1900).” Clio: Women, Gender, History, vol. 37, 2014, pp. 41–64, doi:10.4000/clio.10972.
Gaylin, Ann. “The Madwoman Outside the Attic: Eavesdropping and Narrative Agency in The Woman in White.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 43, no. 3, 2001, pp. 303–33.
Haefele-Thomas, Ardel. Queer Others in Victorian Gothic: Transgressing Monstrosity. U of Wales P, 2012.
Hedgecock, Jennifer. The Femme Fatale in Victorian Literature: The Danger and the Sexual Threat. Cambria Press, 2008.
Heller, Tamar. “The Woman in White: Portrait of the Artist as a Professional Man.” Dead Secrets: Willkie Collins and the Female Gothic, Yale UP, 1992, pp. 110–41. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hk0xd.9/.
Hoffer, Lauren N., and Sarah E. Kersh. “The Victorian Family in Queer Time: Secrets, Sisters, and Lovers in The Woman in White and Fingersmith.” Queer Victorian Families: Curious Relations in Literature, edited by Duc Dau and Shale Preston, Routledge, 2015, pp. 207–22.
Jiménez Ruiz, Ismael, and María Moya Nicolás. “The Family Caregiver: The Naturalized Sense of Obligation in Women to be Caregivers." Enfermería Global, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018, pp. 420‒47.
Kaplan, Laura Duhan. “Woman as Caretaker: An Archetype that Supports Patriarchal Militarism.” Hypatia, vol. 9, no. 2, 1994, pp. 123–33. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3810173/.
Kha, Henry. The Reform of English Divorce Law: 1857–1937. 2017. University of Queensland, PhD dissertation. UQ eSpace.
Ledoux, Ellen. “Was There Ever a ‘Female Gothic’?” Palgrave Communications, vol. 3, 2017, doi:10.1057/palcomms.2017.42.
Leonard, DeLisa. Women and Bodily Separation in Literature from the Victorian Era until Today. 2011. Eastern Michigan University, Master’s Theses and Doctoral dissertation.
Lesnik-Oberstein, Karín. The Last Taboo: Women and Body Hair. Manchester UP, 2011.
Liddle, Dallas. “Wilkie Collins, The Woman in White (1859–60).” Victorian Review, vol. 35, no. 1, 2009, pp. 37–41. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/ 27793695/.
May, Leila Silvana. “Sensational Sisters: Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White.” Pacific Coast Philology, vol. 30, no. 1, 1995, pp. 82–102, doi:10.2307/1316821.
Meckier, Jerome. “Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White: Providence against the Evils of Propriety.” Journal of British Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, 1982, pp. 104–26. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/175659/.
Miller, D. A. “Cage Aux Folles: Sensation and Gender in Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White.” Representations, vol. 14, 1986, pp. 107–36, doi:10.2307/2928437.
Nelson, Heather Lea. The Law and the Lady: Consent and Marriage in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. 2015. Purdue University, Doctoral dissertation. Purdue e-Pubs.
O’Neill, Philip. Wilkie Collins: Women, Property, and Propriety. Rowman & Littlefield, 1988.
Oulton, C. “‘The Good Angel of Our Lives’: Subversive Religion and The Woman in White.” Dickens Studies Annual, vol. 30, 2001, pp. 309–20. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44372020/.
Öztekin, Sercan. “Subversion of Gender Stereotypes in Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White and Mary Elizabeth Braddon’s Lady Audley’s Secret.” Crossroads: A Journal of English Studies, vol. 1, no. 32, 2021, pp. 36–48, doi:10.15290/CR.2021.32.1.03.
Perkins, Pamela, and Mary Donaghy. “A Man’s Resolution: Narrative Strategies in Wilkie Collins’ The Woman in White.” Studies in the Novel, vol. 22, no. 4, 1990, pp. 392–402. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/ 29532745/.
Peterson, Sabrina Elena Cascos. Sensational Deviations: Queering Nineteenth-Century Mystery. 2016. California State University, Master’s thesis. Scholar Works.
Petrie, Charles. “Victorian Women Expected to Be Idle and Ignorant.” Victorian England, edited by Clarice Swisher, Greenhaven Press, 2000, pp. 178–87.
Pykett, Lyn. Wilkie Collins. Authors in Context Series, Oxford UP, 2005.
Querol Díaz, Laura. The Ambiguous Disruption of Gender-Role
Expectations in the Law and the Lady. BS thesis. University of Lleida. Department of English and Linguistic, 2013.
Ruskin, John. Sesame and Lilies, edited by Deborah Epstein Nord, Yale UP, 2002.
Sarnelli, Debora Antonietta. “Gender Ambiguity, Domesticity and the Public Space: The Case of Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White.” English Language, Literature & Culture, vol. 5, no. 3, 2020, pp. 116–23, doi:10.11648/j.ellc.20200503.1.
Showalter, Elaine. “Victorian Women and Insanity.” Victorian Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, 1980, pp. 157–81.
Sontag, Susan, and Annie Leibovitz. Women. Ballantine Books, 2000.
Stone, Pamela K., and Lise Shapiro Sanders. Bodies and Lives in Victorian England: Science, Sexuality, and the Affliction of Being Female. Routledge, 2020, doi:10.4324/9780429398735.
Welter, Barbara. “The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820–1860.” American Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, 1966, pp. 151–74.
Zigarovich, Jolene. “Transing Wilkie Collins.” The Wilkie Collins Journal, vol. 15, 2018. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26996123/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain publishing rights and grant ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies right of first publication.
Simultaneously, all articles and reviews published in ES Review until nº 43 are available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) while those published from nº 44 onwards will be available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), by which others are allowed to share and use their work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
In addition, ES Review allows authors to arrange additional contracts for the non-exclusive publication of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. In such a case, authors are required to approach the editor(s)/publisher to request permission.
