Open innovation and inclusive partnerships in agribusiness: A case study of NG-seeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/nxy3e365Keywords:
Chilean firms, science and technology, partnerships, agribusiness sector, lupineAbstract
Although the open innovation literature has extensively examined the role of external knowledge sources in firms’ innovation performance, their contribution to innovation in the agribusiness sector remains insufficiently understood. This gap is particularly relevant in low-technology industries and countries with reduced technological creation, where firms and farmers may face limited absorptive capacities, as well as technological and resource constraints. To address this gap, this study examines NG-Seeds, a Chilean agribusiness firm, through a case study approach. The findings show that two partnerships played a key role in the firm's strategic reorientation from the animal feed sector towards human nutrition market. These partnerships facilitated access to external knowledge, technological resources, and new market opportunities. However, the findings also indicate that partnerships alone are insufficient to ensure successful innovation. Their effectiveness depends on the firm's ability to develop complementary capabilities to overcome production, technological, and commercial barriers. By highlighting the interplay between external collaboration and internal capabilities, this study contributes to the open innovation literature by explaining how partnerships can support strategic reorientation and innovation in low-technology industries. It also offers practical insights into how firms can leverage external relationships to overcome innovation barriers and explore new market opportunities.
Downloads
References
ARCHIBUGI, D. (2001). Pavitt's taxonomy sixteen years on: a review article. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 10(5), 415-425.
ADOMAKO, S., AMANKWAH‐AMOAH, J., & DANSO, A. (2019). The effects of stakeholder integration on firm‐level product innovativeness: insights from small and medium‐sized enterprises in Ghana. R&D Management, 49(5), 734-747. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12367
ARDITO, L., PETRUZZELLI, A. M., DEZI, L., & CASTELLANO, S. (2020). The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? Journal of Business Research, 119, 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043
BERTELLO, A., DE BERNARDI, P., & RICCIARDI, F. (2024). Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis-an analysis of a research field. Review of Managerial Science, 18(2), 633-683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00655-8+
BOZA, S. Z., HERRERA, X. E., REYES, P. S. A., & SILVA, A. M. (2021). Sistemas de innovación agrícola: una mirada a la situación del sector agrícola ecuatoriano: Agricultural innovation systems: a look to the situation of the ecuadorian agricultural sector. Revista científica ECOCIENCIA, 8, 237-254.
CARAÇA, J., LUNDVALL, B. Å., & MENDONÇA, S. (2009). The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 861-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.003
CASAYA-RODRÍGUEZ, T., RENDÓN-MEDEL, R., AGUILAR-ÁVILA, J., & VERHULST, N. (2025). El escalamiento de innovaciones es una cuestión social: estudio de casos en México. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales-Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25(2), 55-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2025.02.03
CHESBROUGH, H., VANHAVERBEKE, W., & WEST, J. (2014). New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press.
CRUZ CRUZ, J. J., RIVERA GONZÁLEZ, G., & CADENA LÓPEZ, A. (2023). Procesos de conocimiento en productores agrícolas de Xochimilco, México.
DAOOD, A., GIUSTINIANO, L., & GATTI, M. (2021). Exploring the evolution of business model innovation alliances: The case of Velasca. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(07), 2150079.
DOOLEY L, O’SULLIVAN D (2018) Open innovation within the low-technology SME sector. In Researching open innovation in SMEs (pp. 249–271)-. DOI: 10.1142/9789813230972_0008
EMERGEN RESEARCH (2022). Plant Based Protein Market. Report ID: ER_00395. Available in https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/plant-based-protein-market.
FAO. 2016. Public–private partnerships for agribusiness development – A review of international experiences, by Rankin, M., Gálvez Nogales, E., Santacoloma, P., Mhlanga, N. & Rizzo, C. Rome, Italy
FLOR ML, COOPER SY, OLTRA MJ (2018) External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal 36(2):183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.08.003
GHISETTI C, MARZUCCHI A, MONTRESOR S (2015) The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy 44(5):1080–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.001
HEIMSTÄDT, M., & FRIESIKE, S. (2020). The odd couple: contrasting openness in innovation and science. Innovation, 23(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1837631
HOLGERSSON, M., & AABOEN, L. (2019). A literature review of intellectual property management in technology transfer offices: From appropriation to utilization. Technology in Society, 59, 101132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.008
KATZ, J. (2020) Recursos naturales y crecimiento: aspectos macro y microeconómicos, temas regulatorios, derechos ambientales e inclusión social. Documentos de Proyectos (LC/TS.2020/14), Santiago, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), 2020.
KATZY, B., TURGUT, E., HOLZMANN, T., & SAILER, K. (2013). Innovation intermediaries: a process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
KLERKX, L. (2023). Towards agricultural innovation systems 4.0: Supporting directionality, diversity, distribution and democracy in food systems transformation. Wageningen University & Research. DOI: 10.18174/63494
KLINE, S. J., & ROSENBERG, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–305). National Academy Press.
KRISHNAN, R., YEN, P., AGARWAL, R., ARSHINDER, K., & BAJADA, C. (2021). Collaborative innovation and sustainability in the food supply chain-evidence from farmer producer organisations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10525
LLOMBART, P. A. (2024). Sistemas alimentarios locales y producción agroalimentaria de proximidad. Su funcionalidad en la protección de tierras agrícolas. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, (263), 287-317.
MAHMOOD, T., & MUBARIK, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological forecasting and social change, 160, 120248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120248
MARTÍNEZ-CHÁFER, L., MOLINA-MORALES, F. X., & ROIG-TIERNO, N. (2021). Explaining technological innovation of the clustered firms: internal and relational factors. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1883035
MESÍAS, F. J., DIAZ-CARO, C., SAMA-BERROCAL, C., CRESPO-CEBADA, E., & AGUADO-GRAGERA, C. (2024). Un estudio cualitativo sobre la percepción de los canales cortos de comercialización de alimentos a través de grupos de discusión con productores y consumidores. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales-Agricultural and Resource Economics, 24(2), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2024.02.07
MÜLLER-SEITZ, G., 2012. Absorptive and desorptive capacity-related practices at the network level–the case of SEMATECH. R &D Management. 42 (1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00668.x
MUÑOZ-CARVAJAL, E., ARAYA-ANGEL, J. P., GARRIDO-SÁEZ, N., GONZÁLEZ, M., & STOLL, A. (2023). Challenges for plant growth promoting microorganism transfer from science to industry: a case study from Chile. Microorganisms, 11(4), 1061.
MURRAY R, CAULIER-GRICE J, MULGAN G (2010). The open book of social innovation, vol 24. Nesta, London
OBRADOVIĆ, T., VLAČIĆ, B., & DABIĆ, M. (2021). Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda. Technovation, 102, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221
OECD (2025) AGRICULTURAL POLICY MONITORING AND EVALUATION 2025. Making the Most of the Trade and Environment Nexus in Agriculture. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation. 2025. OECD Publishing https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/agricultural-policy-monitoring-and-evaluation-2025_a80ac398-en/full-report/chile_984625ec.html.
OGINK, R. H., GOOSSEN, M. C., ROMME, A. G. L., & AKKERMANS, H. (2023). Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Technovation, 119, 102621- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102621
OSTERWALDER, A., & PIGNEUR, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons
PORTER, M. E. (2016). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster / Free Press.
RIVERA, W. M., QAMAR, M. K., & MWANDEMERE, H. K. (2005). Enhancing coordination among AKIS/RD actors: An analytical and comparative review of country studies on agricultural Knowledge and information systems for rural development (AKIS/RD). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
RASHID, Y., RASHID, A., WARRAICH, M. A., SABIR, S. S., & WASEEM, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 1609406919862424.
ROGERS, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
SANTAMARIA, L., NIETO, M.J., BARGE-GIL, A., 2010. The relevance of different open innovation strategies for R&D performers. Cuadernos de Economía y Direccion de la Empresa 13 (45), 93–114. DOI: 10.1016/S1138-5758(10)70025-6
SOLIMANO, A. (2017). Pensiones a la chilena. Editorial Catalonia.
SOTO, A. R., & FUENTES, R. A. (2015). Non-technological innovations in Chilean agricultural firms: what motivates the decision to innovate and the propensity of innovation? International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 42(2), 171-179.
STOLL, L., MOOR, A., & REID, E. (2026). 13. Schools as learning organizations: leading for creativity. Handbook of Creativity in Schools, 177.
TORRECILLAS, C., FERNANDEZ, S., & GARCIA-GARCIA, C. (2023). Drivers to increase eco-efficiencies in Uruguay, Peru, and Panama. Energy Policy, 183, 113832.
VELLEMA, S., SCHOUTEN, G., & VAN TULDER, R. (2020). Partnering capacities for inclusive development in food provisioning. Development Policy Review, 38(6), 710-727.
VAN DE VRANDE, V., DE JONG, J. P., VANHAVERBEKE, W., & DE ROCHEMONT, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
VAN DER PLOEG, J. D. (2014). Diez cualidades de la agricultura familiar. LEISA Revista de Agroecología, 29(4), 6-8.
VLACHOPOULOU, M., ZIAKIS, C., VERGIDIS, K., & MADAS, M. (2021). Analyzing agrifood-tech e-business models. Sustainability, 13(10), 5516.
YIN, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
YIN, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative research methods, 5(14), 359-386
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Romilio Ernesto Labra Lillo, Celia Torrecillas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published at Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros will have a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows the authors to retain publishing rights. Authors may reprint their articles in other media without having to request authorization, provided they indicate that the article was originally published in Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros.