The Grotto as Neo-Victorian Heterotopia: Sonia Overall’s The Realm of Shells (2006) and Essie Fox’s Elijah’s Mermaid (2012)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.45.2024.11-30Keywords:
Grotto, heterotopia, Victorian, Neo-Victorian, Sonia Overall, Essie FoxAbstract
News of the discoveries of natural grottos filled the pages of newspapers and journals throughout the nineteenth century. Additionally, artificial grottos opened regularly for the entertainment of the public and were commonplace in the cultural and literary products of the period. In this article, I analyse neo-Victorian appropriations of nineteenth-century grottos as Foucauldian heterotopias through two case studies: Sonia Overall’s The Realm of Shells (2006) and Essie Fox’s Elijah’s Mermaid (2012). Overall’s and Fox’s novels illustrate how the heterotopic features of the Victorian grotto are expanded in neo-Victorian fiction as counter-spaces of emplacement that enable heterochronic forms of resistance.
Downloads
References
“Antiquities.” West Kent Guardian, 22 Aug. 1840, p. 5.
Arias, Rosario. “(Sub)Urban Landscapes and Perception in Neo-Victorian Fiction.” Haunted Landscapes: Super-Nature and the Environment, edited by Ruth Heholt and Niamh Downing, Rowman & Littlefield, 2016, pp. 149–64.
Arias, Rosario. “Traces and Vestiges of the Victorian Past in Contemporary Fiction.” Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations, edited by Nadine Boehm-Schnitker and Susanne Gruss, Routledge, 2014, pp. 111–22.
Arias, Rosario, and Patricia Pulham, editors. Haunting and Spectrality in Neo-Victorian Fiction. Possessing the Past. Palgrave, 2009.
Boehm-Schnitzer, Nadine, and Susanne Gruss, editors. Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations. Routledge, 2014.
Bowler, Alexia L., and Jessica Cox. “Introduction to Adapting the Nineteenth Century: Revisiting, Revising and Rewriting the Past.” Neo-Victorian Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, 2009, pp. 1–17, neovictorianstudies.com/article/view/265/.
Colman, George. The Gay Deceivers, or, More Laugh than Love. John Cawthorn and James Cawthorn, 1808.
Costantini, Mariaconcetta. “Mapping Gothic London: Urban Waste, Class Rage and Mixophobia in Dan Simmon’s Drood.” Neo-Victorian Cities: Reassessing Urban Politics and Poetics, edited by Marie-Luise Kohlke and Christian Gutleben, Brill, 2015, pp. 175–200.
Dehaene, Michiel, and Lieven De Cauter, editors. Heterotopia and the City. Public Space in a Postcivil Society. Routledge, 2008.
De Quincey, Thomas. The Collected Writings of Thomas De Quincey. Vol. 11, A&C Black, 1889–90.
Disraeli, Benjamin. Sybil; or The Two Nations. Henry Colburn, 1845.
Esser, Helena Katharina. Re-calibrating the Urban Matrix: Imaginaries of Victorian London in Steampunk Fiction. 2020. University of London, PhD Dissertation.
Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Heterotopia and the City. Public Space in a Postcivil Society, edited by Michiel Dehaene and Lieven De Cauter, Routledge, 2008, pp. 13–29.
Fox, Essie. Elijah’s Mermaid. Orion Books, 2012.
Gay, Penny et al., editors. Victorian Turns, Neo Victorian Returns: Essays on Fiction and Culture, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008.
Godwin, William. Fleetwood; or, the New Man of Feeling. 1805. Richard Bentley, 1832.
Gutleben, Christian. Nostalgic Postmodernism: The Victorian Tradition and the Contemporary British Novel. Rodopi, 2001.
Haslam, Ruby Mary. Reality and Imagery: The Grottoes of Margate and Twickenham. Athena Press, 2009.
Hazlitt, William. Lectures on the English Poets. Taylor and Hessey, 1818.
Heholt, Ruth, and Niamh Downing, editors. Haunted Landscapes: Super-Nature and the Environment. Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
Heilmann, Ann, and Mark Llewellyn. “Hystorical Fictions: Women (Re)Writing and (Re)Reading History.” Women: A Cultural Review, vol. 15, no. 2, 2004, pp. 137–49, doi: 10.1080/0957404042000234006.
Heilmann, Ann, and Mark Llewellyn. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Hemans, Felicia. Poems. T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1808.
Ho, Elizabeth. “The Neo-Victorian-at-Sea: Towards a Global Memory of the Victorian.” Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations, edited by Boehm-Schnitzer and Susanne Gruss, Routledge, 2014, pp. 165–78.
Hunt, Leigh. Foliage: or Poems Original and Translated. C. and J. Ollier, 1818.
Jackson, Hazelle. Shell Houses and Grottoes. Shire Publications, 2001.
Kendal Mercury, 4 Aug.1838, p. 4.
Kohlke, Marie-Luise, and Christian Gutleben, editors. Neo-Victorian Cities: Reassessing Urban Politics and Poetics, Brill, 2015.
Kohlke, Marie-Luise et al. “Heterotopic and Neo-Victorian Affinities: Introducing the Special Issue on Neo-Victorian Heterotopias.” Humanities, vol. 11, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/h11010008.
Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Translated by Keith Tribe, MIT Press, 1985.
Landon, Letitia Elizabeth. Life and Literary Remains. Henry Colburn, 1841.
“Links with the Past.” Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 3 Apr. 1898, p. 9.
Maier, Sarah E., and Brenda Ayres, editors. Neo-Victorian Madness: Rediagnosing Nineteenth-Century Mental Illness in Literature and Other Media. Palgrave, 2020.
Massey, Doreen. For Space. Sage Publications, 2005.
Meredith, George. Diana of the Crossways. Chapman and Hall, 1885.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Primacy of Perception: and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy or Art, History and Politics. Translated and edited by James M. Edie, Northwestern UP, 1964.
“Midsummer Night’s Dream at Pope’s Villa.” Pall Mall Gazette, 19 July 1888, p. 3.
Mitchell, Kate. History and Cultural Memory in Neo-Victorian Fiction: Victorian Afterimages. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Monrós-Gaspar, Laura. “Of Grottos, Asylums and Lost Mermaids: Female Identities and Postmodern Heterotopias in Essie Fox.” Material Traces of the Past in Contemporary Literature International Conference, 6–8 May 2015, Universidad de Málaga.
Monrós-Gaspar, Laura. “La ninfa Eco como personaje secundario en la tradición burlesca británica (1825–1865).” A la sombra de los héroes, edited by Francesco De Martino and Carmen Morenilla, Levante Editori, 2014, pp. 401–20.
“Nota Bene.” Dover Express, 27 Aug. 1948, p. 5.
Onega, Susana, and Jean-Michel Ganteau, editors. Contemporary Trauma Narratives: Liminality and the Ethics of Form. Routledge, 2014.
Onega, Susana, and Jean-Michel Ganteau. “Introduction. Performing the Void: Liminality and the Ethics of Form in Contemporary Trauma Narratives.” Contemporary Trauma Narratives: Liminality and the Ethics of Form, edited by Susana Onega and Jean-Michel Ganteau, Routledge, 2014, pp. 1–20.
Overall, Sonia. The Realm of Shells. Harper Perennial, 2006.
Overall, Sonia. Walking, Making, Thinking, 2018. Canterbury Christ Church University, PhD Dissertation.
“The Provinces.” London Evening Standard, 31 July 1888, p. 3.
Renk, Kathleen. Women Writing the Neo-Victorian Novel: Erotic “Victorians.” Palgrave, 2020.
Ricoeur, Paul. Memory, History, Forgetting. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer, U of Chicago P, 2006.
Robinson, Alan. Narrating the Past: Historiography, Memory and the Contemporary Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Scott, Emily Jane. Traversing Trauma and Consuming Perverse Pleasures in the Neo-Victorian Novel. 2014. University of Portsmouth, PhD Dissertation.
Shelley, Mary. The Last Man. 1826. Hogarth, 1985.
Shiller, Dana. “The Redemptive Past in the Neo-Victorian Novel.” Studies in the Novel, vol. 29, no. 4, 1997, pp. 538–60.
Suwa, Akira. “Staying in the Mess”: Gender, Sexuality and Queer Heterotopic Space in Sarah Waters’s Neo-Historical Narratives. 2018. Cardiff University, PhD Dissertation.
“Visit to Hampton Court.” Bell's Life in London, 28 Nov. 1824, p. 1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Monrós Gaspar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain publishing rights and grant ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies right of first publication.
Simultaneously, all articles and reviews published in ES Review until nº 43 are available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) while those published from nº 44 onwards will be available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), by which others are allowed to share and use their work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
In addition, ES Review allows authors to arrange additional contracts for the non-exclusive publication of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. In such a case, authors are required to approach the editor(s)/publisher to request permission.
