From Waste to Renewal: Circular Economy and the Ethics of Degrowth in Record of a Spaceborn Few
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24197/qmx2wd40Keywords:
Becky Chambers, Speculative Fiction, Circular Economy, Critical PosthumanismAbstract
This article examines the alternative future of Becky Chambers’s Record of a Spaceborn Few through the frameworks of circular economy, degrowth, and critical posthumanism. As I shall argue, Chambers’s novel envisions a future society that moves beyond extractive capitalism, emphasising a sustainable socio-economic system with communal labour and non-hierarchical social structures through the Fleet, a collection of ships inhabited by the descendants of the last humans on Earth. By analysing the Fleet’s socio-economic system, this article explores how and to what extent Chambers criticises lineal capitalism and proposes an alternative mode of existence, potentially more aligned with critical posthumanism. Drawing on economic theory and speculative fiction, including science fiction, scholarship, the article argues that Chambers’s novel offers a complex vision of post-capitalist futures, demonstrating the role of science fiction in imagining sustainable alternatives to the Anthropocene.
Downloads
References
Adelman, Sam. “The Sustainable Development Goals, Anthropocentrism and Neoliberalism.” Sustainable Development Goals, edited by Duncan French and Louis J. Kotzé. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 15-40.
Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana UP, 2010.
Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.
Boulding, K. E. “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth.” Environmental Quality Issues in a Growing Economy, edited by H. Jarrett. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1966, pp. 3-14.
Browne, Craig. “Hope, Critique, and Utopia.” Critical Horizons, vol. 6, no. 1, 2005, pp. 63–86, doi: 10.1163/156851605775009483.
Calarco, Matthew. Thinking Through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction. Stanford UP, 2015.
Chambers, Becky. A Closed and Common Orbit. Hodder & Stoughton, 2016.
Chambers, Becky. Record of a Spaceborn Few: Wayfarers 3. Hachette UK, 2018.
Chambers, Becky. The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet. Hodder & Stoughton, 2014.
Chambers, Becky. The Galaxy, and the Ground Within: Wayfarers 4. Hodder & Stoughton, 2021.
Corvellec, Hervé, et al. “Critiques of the Circular Economy.” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 26, no. 2, 2021, pp. 421–32, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13187.
Cox, Carolyn. “Congratulations to the 2019 Hugo Award Winners!” The Portalist, 19 Aug. 2019, theportalist.com/2019-hugo-award-winners/.
De Corato, Ugo. “Agricultural Waste Recycling in Horticultural Intensive Farming Systems by On-Farm Composting and Compost-Based Tea Application Improves Soil Quality and Plant Health: A Review under the Perspective of a Circular Economy.” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 738, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139840.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, and Granta Design. “Circularity Indicators: An Approach to Measuring Circularity.” Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2015, content.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/m/
5df196c8314ff61f/original/Circularity-Indicators-Project-Overview.pdf/.
Flynn, Mathew. “Capitalism and Immigration Control: What Political Economy Reveals about the Growth of Detention Systems.” Global Detention Project, no. 16, 2016, pp. 1-21.
Flood, Alison. “Self-Published Sci-Fi Debut Kickstarts on to Kitschies Shortlist.” The Guardian, 13 Feb. 2015, www.theguardian.com/books/2015/feb/13/self-published-sci-fi-debut-kickstarts-on-to-kitschies-shortlist/.
Geisendorf, Sylvie, and Felicitas Pietrulla. “The Circular Economy and Circular Economic Concepts—A Literature Analysis and Redefinition.” Thunderbird International Business Review, vol. 60, no. 5, 2017, pp. 771–82, doi: 10.1002/tie.21924.
Gertenbach, Lars, et al. “Eating Ourselves out of Industrial Excess? Degrowth, Multi-Species Conviviality and the Micro-Politics of Cultured Meat.” Anthropological Theory, vol. 21, no. 3, 2021, pp. 386–408, doi: 10.1177/1463499620981544.
Gill, R. B. “The Uses of Genre and the Classification of Speculative Fiction.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, vol. 46, no. 2, 2013, pp. 71–85, doi: 10.1353/mos.2013.0021.
Hajiyeva M. “Sounding Voices and Shifting Perspectives: Polyphony and Hetero-Glossia in Utopian and Dystopian Fiction and Cinema.” Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, no. 126, 2024, pp. 83-88, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10655476.
Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke UP, 2016.
Hermida-Ramos, Beatriz. “Hope is the New Punk: Politics of Storytelling, Queerness and Marginalized Communities in Becky Chambers’ The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet.” Gaudeamus, vol. 0, 2020, pp. 27–46, gaudeamusjournal.org/index.php/gaudeamus/article/view/7/.
Huws, Ursula. “The Hassle of Housework: Digitalisation and the Commodification of Domestic Labour.” Feminist Review, vol. 123, no. 1, 2019, pp. 8–23, doi: 10.1177/0141778919879725.
Kallis, Giorgos, and Hug March. “Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 105, no. 2, 2015, pp. 360–68, doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.973803.
Kehe, Jason. “Is Becky Chambers the Ultimate Hope for Science Fiction?” WIRED, 16 Sep. 2021, www.wired.com/story/is-becky-chambers-ultimate-hope-science-fiction/.
Kopnina, Helen. “Exploring Posthuman Ethics: Opening New Spaces for Postqualitative Inquiry within Pedagogies of the Circular Economy.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 38, no. 3–4, 2022, pp. 361–74, doi: 10.1017/aee.2021.16.
Kuijer, Lenneke, and Matthias Laschke. “Designing for a Post-Growth Society through the Eco-Harmonist. A Critical Examination of the Role of HCI and Technology Design.” Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2024, pp. 1–13, doi:10.1145/3679318.3685405.
Latouche, Serge. “The Path to Degrowth for a Sustainable Society.” Factor X: Challenges, Implementation Strategies and Examples for a Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, edited by Harry Lehmann, Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 277–84, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50079-9_17.
Menger, Eva. “‘What It Feels to Be the Other:’ Imaginations of Displacement in Contemporary Speculative Fiction.” Studies in Arts and Humanities, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1–18, www.sahjournal.com/article/6075/galley/13819/view/.
Mitchell, Audra and Aadita Chaudhury. “Worlding beyond ‘the’ ‘End’ of ‘the World’: White Apocalyptic Visions and BIPOC Futurisms.” International Relations, vol. 34, no. 3, 2020, pp. 309-332.
Murphy, Annie J. “Defining Essential: How Custodial Labour Became Synonymous with Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” ReEssentiality of Work, edited by Markus Helfen et al. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2024, pp. 39–56, doi: 10.1108/S0277-283320240000036003.
Pergola, Maria, et al. “Composting: The Way for a Sustainable Agriculture.” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 123, 2018, pp. 744–50, doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.016.
Rashid, Muhammad Imtiaz, and Khurram Shahzad. “Food Waste Recycling for Compost Production and Its Economic and Environmental Assessment as Circular Economy Indicators of Solid Waste Management.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 317, 2021, pp 1-11, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128467.
Reimann, Andres. “Science Fiction Debate: Why Have We Stopped Imagining the Future?” ERR, 25 May 2024, news.err.ee/1609348986/science-fiction-debate-why-have-we-stopped-imagining-futures/.
Richter, Katharina. “Struggling for Another Life: The Ontology of Degrowth.” Transtext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化. Journal of Global Cultural Studies, no. 14, 2019, doi: 10.4000/transtexts.1242.
Rogan, Alcena Madeline Davis. “Utopian Studies.” The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by Mark Bould et al., Routledge, 2009, pp. 308–16.
Roldán-Romero, Vanesa. “Transhumanism and the Anthropocene in Becky Chambers’ A Closed and Common Orbit.” Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos, vol. 26, 2022, pp. 77–104.
Savini, Federico. “Futures of the Social Metabolism: Degrowth, Circular Economy and the Value of Waste.” Futures, vol. 150, 2023, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103180.
Schröder, Patrick, et al. “Degrowth within—Aligning Circular Economy and Strong Sustainability Narratives.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 146, 2019, pp. 190–91, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.038.
Shimane, Katsumi. “Social Bonds with the Dead: How Funerals Transformed in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 373, 2018, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0274.
Singh, Neera M. “Environmental Justice, Degrowth and Post-Capitalist Futures.” Ecological Economics, vol. 163, 2019, pp. 138–42, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.014.
Solér, Cecilia. Stress, Affluence and Sustainable Consumption. Routledge, 2017, doi: 10.4324/9781315174792.
Steffen, Will, et al. “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Socienty A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, no. 369, 2011, pp. 842–67, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.
Tally Jr., Robert T. “The-End-of-the-World as World System.” Other Globes: Past and Peripheral Imaginations of Globalization, edited by Simon Ferdinand et al., Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019, pp. 267–84, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14980-2_14.
Trebilcock, Michael J., and Matthew Sudak. “The Political Economy of Emigration and Immigration.” New York University Law Review, vol. 81, no. 1, 2006, p. 234.
Trentmann, Frank, editor. “Introduction.” The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World, Berg Publishers, 2006, pp. 1–30.
United Nations. “Experts Explore Potential of Global Transition to Circular Economy.” United Nations, www.un.org/en/desa/experts-explore-potential-global-transition-circular-economy/.
Vence, Xavier, et al. “Economía circular, sustentabilidade e decrecemento.” Revista Galega de Economía, vol. 33, no. 2, 2024, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.15304/rge.33.2.10036.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vanesa Roldán Romero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain publishing rights and grant ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies right of first publication.
Simultaneously, all articles and reviews published in ES Review until nº 43 are available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) while those published from nº 44 onwards will be available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), by which others are allowed to share and use their work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
In addition, ES Review allows authors to arrange additional contracts for the non-exclusive publication of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. In such a case, authors are required to approach the editor(s)/publisher to request permission.