Knowledge, power, and pleasure in BDSM

Notes for a practical experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24197/4bmzz960

Keywords:

BDSM, power, pleasure, sex, pharmacopornography

Abstract

This article analyzes BDSM practices from a philosophical and socio-epistemic perspective, aiming to explore their emancipatory potential and their limitations within the contemporary heterosexual and pharmacopornographic regime. Starting from a Foucauldian conception of power as relational, dynamic, and productive, the text examines how the consensual exchange of power in BDSM can constitute a form of knowledge-pleasure decentered from traditional knowledge-power.

First, it reviews interpretations from the so-called "psychological sciences," especially Lacanian readings of jouissance, highlighting their contributions and limitations in accounting for the diversity of identities, roles, and experiences involved in these practices. Next, it analyzes the performative and fictional nature of BDSM scenes, understood as heterotopic spaces where norms, bodies, and hierarchies can be negotiated, suspended, or resignified.

The article pays particular attention to the decentralization of the body, genitalia, and penetration as axes of sexual pleasure, as well as the eroticization of power as a central element of these dynamics. However, it also points out the risks that BDSM may reproduce structural gender inequalities and reinforce phallocentrism under new symbolic forms, especially when mediated by commercial pornography.

Finally, it concludes that BDSM possesses significant epistemic and political potential for rethinking desire, consent, and the distribution of power, although this potential requires constant critical review to avoid its co-optation by the dominant ideology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coppo, Diego. El goce en Lacan: entre problema y concepto. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de General San Martín].

Damián, León Alberto. (2021). Arquitecturas, cuerpos y poder: reflexiones teóricas sobre el trazado de cartografías sexuales urbanas. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios de Género de El Colegio de México, 7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24201/reg.v7i1.611.

Damián, León Alberto. (2023). Tecnologías de Eros. Contribución para una teoría micropolítica del placer. Egales.

Despentes, Virginie. (2007). Teoría King Kong (Paul Preciado, trans.). Editorial Melusina. (Original publicado en 2006).

Downing, Lisa. (2012) Reading Bitchy Jones's Diary: sex blogging, community-building and feminism(s). Psychology & Sexuality, 3 (1), 5-11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.627691.

Fennell, Julie. (2022). Visions of Femdom, Old and New. En: Clifford-Napoleone, Amber R. (ed.) Binding and Unbinding Kink. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06485-2_10.

Hale, Jacob C. (1997). Leatherdyke boys and their daddies: How to have sex without women or men. Social Text, 15(3/4), 223–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/466741.

Jeong, Seung Hoon (2016). Femdom, the Libidinal Edge of Interfacial Heaven. Rivista di estetica, 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1269.

Lai, Yi-Ling (2019). What Pat(rick) Califia can teach us and Deleuze cannot: A Lacanian reading of BDSM erotica and contemporary ideologies. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 24(2), 197–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-019-00122-y.

López, Esteban Rodrigo (2023). Régimen farmacopornográfico: el control del cuerpo y la subjetividad en la nueva era capitalista. Eikasía Revista de Filosofía, (115), 71-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.115.572.

Meeker, Caroline, McGill, Catherine M. y Rocco, Tonette S. (2020). Navigation of Feminist and Submissive Identity by Women in the BDSM Community: A Structured Literature Review. Sexuality & Culture, 24, 1594–1618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09681-9.

Ortmann, Dennis Michael y Sprott, Richard Alan (2012). Sexual outsiders: Understanding BDSM sexualities and communities. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Pitagora, Diana (2013). Consent vs. coercion: BDSM interactions highlight a fine but immutable line. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 10(1), 27-36. Recuperado el 16 de enero de 2026 en: https://www.nspb.net/index.php/nspb/article/view/180.

Preciado, Paul (2020). Testo yonqui. Sexo, drogas y biopolítica. Anagrama. (Edición original publicada en 2008).

Rubin, Gayle (1989). Reflexionando sobre el sexo: notas para una teoría radical de la sexualidad. En Vance, Carol (ed.) Placer y peligro.

Explorando la sexualidad femenina (pp. 113-190). Talasa Ediciones.

Sáez, Javier (2005). “Excesos de la masculinidad: la cultura leather y la cultura de los osos”. En: Grupo de Trabajo Queer (ed.), El eje del mal es heterosexual. Figuraciones, movimientos y prácticas feministas queer (pp. 137-148). Traficantes de Sueños.

Sicerone, Diego (2020). Representación del cuerpo en el régimen farmaco-pornográfico. Saga–Revista de Estudiantes de Filosofía, (36), 44-49. Recuperado el 14 de enero de 2026 en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/saga/article/view/93717.

Simula, Brandy L. (2019). Pleasure, power, and pain: A review of the literature on the experiences of BDSM participants. Sociology Compass, 13(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12668.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-21

How to Cite

Knowledge, power, and pleasure in BDSM: Notes for a practical experience. (2026). MariCorners: Revista De Estudios Interdisciplinares LGTBIA+ Y Queer, 3(2), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.24197/4bmzz960